The Ford Torino Page Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Model Specific Forum > 1972-1976 Ford and Mercury
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - INFO: Adjustable strut rod - the holy grail
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login

INFO: Adjustable strut rod - the holy grail

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>
Author
Message
cggrob View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 28-November-2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cggrob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: INFO: Adjustable strut rod - the holy grail
    Posted: 11-September-2014 at 1:48PM
Working on doing suspension upgrades on my 1972 Torino.  I will have more on the overall later, but for now, I thought you might like to see my solution for getting rid of that big mushy ball on the end of the strut rod.  Obviously it has to have enough compliance to be able adjust caster, but it allows far too many geometry changes when the car is in motion.  This is a big block car with the mushy big block springs and poly urethane bushings in the top a-arms, stock rubber in the lower.  In my opinion, this is the biggest single modification you can make to improve stability and crispness in handling to the front suspension.  It is hard to describe the difference in fell and solidity this makes!
Back to Top
cggrob View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 28-November-2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cggrob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 1:49PM
Back to Top
cggrob View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 28-November-2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cggrob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 1:51PM
Back to Top
cggrob View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 28-November-2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cggrob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 1:52PM
Back to Top
cggrob View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 28-November-2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cggrob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 1:53PM
Back to Top
cggrob View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 28-November-2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cggrob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 1:58PM
Left side of car looking towards front showing front attachment point on frame
 
Left side - side view on car.
Back to Top
Regul8r View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 26-December-2007
Location: Sarasota FL
Status: Offline
Points: 6624
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Regul8r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 2:03PM
AWESOMENESS!!!
 
We have talked about this before on the site.
Is that an over the counter type bracket?
Looks like the ones you can buy for the Mustangs?
 
Carl Corey (Moderator/Event Coordinator) Contact ANYTIME!
1976 Ford Elite "Lola Mae"
97 Suzuki Intruder 1400
US Army Retired
Back to Top
cggrob View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 28-November-2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cggrob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 2:22PM
We have talked about this before on the site.
Is that an over the counter type bracket?
Looks like the ones you can buy for the Mustangs?
 
The bracket is custom machined.  The swedge tube is 6" long form UB Machine in IN.  Everything else is McMaster Carr (ie: off the shelf hardware).  3/4" except the through bolt for the rod end.  Rod end is 5/8", high strength, high misalignment with a 3/4" NF thread extended long shank to match the diameter of the original strut rod.  The original strut rod is cut off and retained where it bolts to the lower A-arm.
Back to Top
Regul8r View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 26-December-2007
Location: Sarasota FL
Status: Offline
Points: 6624
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Regul8r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 3:04PM
interested in making some more of these?
Got a parts list by numbers so others could just go shopping and get all the parts?
Do you have a pricing breakdown?
What was the total cost on doing these?
 
Carl Corey (Moderator/Event Coordinator) Contact ANYTIME!
1976 Ford Elite "Lola Mae"
97 Suzuki Intruder 1400
US Army Retired
Back to Top
Eliteman76 View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 20-March-2006
Location: Nebraska, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 5044
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Eliteman76 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 3:26PM
I've been talking to Rosehill Performance about this very thing. 
OK, I'm game, what's the cost on this?

What's good it this turns the lower arm more into a lat A arm. Why this excites is this will certainly improve things for steering and control.

Now if we could just get roller bearing idler arms, and do something about the slop on lower/upper arm bushings.

Andrew:GTS.ORG admin, '72 Q code 5 speed Restomod
Pondering: #99Problems
Back to Top
Regul8r View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 26-December-2007
Location: Sarasota FL
Status: Offline
Points: 6624
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Regul8r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 3:30PM
I'm with you Andy, these are WORLDS above and improvements on the sloppiness of our steering/suspension!
 
I'd be in for a pair too!
 
Carl Corey (Moderator/Event Coordinator) Contact ANYTIME!
1976 Ford Elite "Lola Mae"
97 Suzuki Intruder 1400
US Army Retired
Back to Top
Billy C View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 10-February-2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 947
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Billy C Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 3:36PM
Very nice work. Thanks for all the pictures.
-Billy Conturo
Back to Top
Billy C View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 10-February-2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 947
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Billy C Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 3:40PM
Originally posted by Eliteman76 Eliteman76 wrote:

Now if we could just get roller bearing idler arms, and do something about the slop on lower/upper arm bushings.
Damn, I totally forgot about that part. Embarrassed 
-Billy Conturo
Back to Top
ilyes View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 09-January-2010
Location: Philadelphia PA
Status: Offline
Points: 3782
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ilyes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-September-2014 at 4:10PM
Looks good, I'll keep that one in mind when the time comes.
Back to Top
Rockatansky View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 30-July-2010
Location: On The Road
Status: Offline
Points: 6059
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rockatansky Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-September-2014 at 7:44AM
I'm in as soon as available
72 GT Ute
   
Back to Top
Eliteman76 View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 20-March-2006
Location: Nebraska, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 5044
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Eliteman76 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-September-2014 at 9:22AM
I'm staring at a pair of strut rods as we speak.
When I spoke with Rosehill, $275 per pair with you supplying your own rods to be modified. His end piece was larger that what's pictured but I'd need to look again.
If I knew dimensions I know local shops that can machine threads as well.
Andrew:GTS.ORG admin, '72 Q code 5 speed Restomod
Pondering: #99Problems
Back to Top
72FordGTS View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
GTS.org Admin

Joined: 06-September-2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 5802
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 72FordGTS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-September-2014 at 2:55PM
These look interesting and should allow for better adjustability of the front suspension.  Normally the caster is adjusted at the upper arms on our cars but an adjustable strut rod should all for additional adjustment.
 
My only concern is that the suspension was originally designed to let the strut rods move somewhat fore and aft.  This new design will not allow for any movement fore and aft.  My guess is this might add some harshness to the ride, but I am not sure if there will be any other adverse effects.


Edited by 72FordGTS - 12-September-2014 at 2:55PM
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car

GTS.org Admin
Back to Top
Regul8r View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 26-December-2007
Location: Sarasota FL
Status: Offline
Points: 6624
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Regul8r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-September-2014 at 4:03PM
Other than the obvious SOLID mounting the other issue that need SPECIAL attention.
 
You DON'T want to use this as a Caster adjustment.
You want the lower ball joints to be located at exactly the same point.
IF the lower points are fore or aft of each other you will get a DIAMOND effect like we do with the race cars. This will cause a pull/drift, even if the caster/camber is the same.
This acts just like a rear end being out of square causing a thrust angle type situation.
 
The adjust ability will help with ensuring the locations of the lower ball joints are MATCHED.
 
Carl Corey (Moderator/Event Coordinator) Contact ANYTIME!
1976 Ford Elite "Lola Mae"
97 Suzuki Intruder 1400
US Army Retired
Back to Top
cggrob View Drop Down
Member
Member


Joined: 28-November-2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status: Offline
Points: 72
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote cggrob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-October-2014 at 3:01PM
Sorry for the long wait on my reply guys - been working my A$$ off. 
First, I am a P.E. so here is the disclaimer:  the information presented herein is presented for educational purposes only and the parts and modifications shown herein should never be done to a vehicle that will be operated on a public highway. 
 
Therefore, I will not be making any of these for anyone else.
 
Please see rough machinist drawing for the "clevis" piece and washer.  The most critical dimension is that the portion of the clevis which passes through the frame has to have a diameter of 1.445".  the unmolested hole size at the frame mounting point on my car is 1.448", which is a 1972 built in October 1971. Do use some high strength free-machining steel if you can find it, but generally I think the whole thing is a little overdesigned and regular carbon steel (1020 or similar) would work fine.  If using cold roll shafting it will be tough for a machinist to cut the deep U.
 
I used a rod end from the McMaster Carr catalog, part # 6960T42. This is a high-misalignment 5/8" rod end with over size 3/4" long shank (2") and 3/4-16 LH (fine) thread with a 22,000# radial load.  The 3/4" shank allows you to mate with the existing strut rod which is 3/4" diameter, by threading it 3/4-16 RH ( a more common die for most of us).  The 5/8" rod end is less bulky than the 3/4" and allows  high misalignment rod end fit in the existing space.  Do use a high misalignment rod end to permit full articulation of the suspension. The bolt holding the clevis to the car is a 2 3/4" long allen head socket screw with full length thread of 2 3/4" (they are all grade 8), McMaster Carr catalog, part # 91251A047.  The strut rod is joined to the rod end using a UB Machine 3/4" "trailing arm", 6" long, which comes pre-threaded 3/4"-16 RH and LH.  UB Machine part # is 42-0602-A - they are about $10 a piece.  You should be able to put it all together including jam nuts for about $100 if you can machine this yourself.  I think the $275 mentioned for a machine shop to make this up is a very fair price.
 
I have tested this by driving over a road filled with roots that looks like a suspension proving track, and also at highway speed.  My impression is that you really do not need a bearing in the LCA.  This strut rod stabilizes the front suspension so much you really have to experience it and I would do this before I considered doing that.  I also believe it is good to have a little extra compliance in that location (the LCA mounting point/bushing), though this car does have poly bushings in the LCA and UCA now.  You can adjust the caster using the adjustable strut rod if you wish.  The ball joints are going to stay "lined up" regardless - they are 2 opposing points which always make a straight line.  what you may be doing is putting some extra stress on the UCA bushings.  My procedure is to align the suspension using the factory method, and then fine tune in some extra caster with the adjustable strut rod. This will put a little preload on the upper bushings and I don't believe it will result in any premature wear - but then, if you are doing this, that's not going to be a concern.  I also believe this helps tighten up the suspension.  If you are after "factory specs" for your alignment, you can set the caster to what I think is about 1 degree less than factory as your LCA will not be deflecting under load as it did with the rubber bushing, so the dynamic caster will be about factory spec.  It does appear to me that this suspension layout benefits from increased caster, so I am going +1 degree to factory setting giving me what I think is 2 degrees increased dynamic caster.
 
Regular8 said this: "IF the lower points are fore or aft of each other you will get a DIAMOND effect like we do with the race cars. This will cause a pull/drift, even if the caster/camber is the same" and he is correct, so do try to take this into account.  Having said that, think of the factory assembly tolerances and bushing slop in this design, and I think as long as you are pretty close you are going to be OK.  I purposely did a little offset adjustment side-to-side and did not notice any difference in my test drive with street tires - YMMV.
 
Guys I tried to answer all the questions raised but just reply if I missed something.
Back to Top
Billy C View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 10-February-2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 947
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Billy C Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-October-2014 at 3:48AM
My setup seems to be solid as well. Had it out for 2 weeks or so now. I've run brakes to full lock and hit lots of Pittsburgh potholes at speed. My biggest worry is the factory strut rod because who knows what material that is. Makes analysis way more difficult. Also fatigue is a nasty one.  The other stuff isn't to hard because any grade material can be used and calculated accordingly. 

I actually think ride quality improved over the rubber bushings. Then again it's hard to tell when there's no interior and a big loud V8 roaring at 5500rpm. I'm sure "ride quality" for me is not what Ford designed originally.

As far as alignments specs go. I think as long as the lower ball joint relative to the chassis on both sides is the same then it's fine.  Check rear axle alignment. It's astonishing how much that is out on my car. I'd say a couple degrees at least. Probably from all the sideways action. Evil Smile
-Billy Conturo
Back to Top
aquartlow View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 19-December-2011
Location: Summerfield, Fl
Status: Offline
Points: 2270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aquartlow Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-October-2014 at 9:36AM
Originally posted by Billy C Billy C wrote:

 Check rear axle alignment. It's astonishing how much that is out on my car. I'd say a couple degrees at least. Probably from all the sideways action. Evil Smile
 
X2^^^. I also couldn't believe how far "out of square" my rear axle assembly was until I ran string lines while attempting a "shade tree" front end alignment. I then had to do both a front AND a rear alignment Ouch.
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires.

No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t.

Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone.
Back to Top
Billy C View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 10-February-2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Status: Offline
Points: 947
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Billy C Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-October-2014 at 5:52PM
Kind of off topic but how can the rear end be aligned without adjustable links? I know the factory had slightly eccentric bushing sleeves of some sort but with polyurethane bushings I don't think it's the same.
-Billy Conturo
Back to Top
aquartlow View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 19-December-2011
Location: Summerfield, Fl
Status: Offline
Points: 2270
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote aquartlow Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-October-2014 at 11:31PM
Originally posted by Billy C Billy C wrote:

Kind of off topic but how can the rear end be aligned without adjustable links? I know the factory had slightly eccentric bushing sleeves of some sort but with polyurethane bushings I don't think it's the same.
 
Billy C,
 I had to elongate the upper/lower control arm bolt hole brackets on the rear axle (drivers side toward the rear, passenger side toward the front), re-install the upper/lower control arms with longer grade 8 bolts through HD 1/8" thick washers on each side of the factory upper/lower control arm brackets. Once positioned "square" in the chassis(with ratchet straps) and had same offset on each side using a string line, I tacked, then welded the washers in place on the brackets after removing the arms so I didn't burn up my urethane bushings. No more "dog-legging". Using a string line on each side before "squaring", one string touched the passenger side tire but the other was off the driver's side about 1.5" or so. I apologize for being off topic and/or taking up space on this thread explaining my situation/remedy.
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires.

No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t.

Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone.
Back to Top
Regul8r View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar
Moderator

Joined: 26-December-2007
Location: Sarasota FL
Status: Offline
Points: 6624
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Regul8r Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-December-2014 at 2:06PM
brought this back up during the UCA discussions.
Carl Corey (Moderator/Event Coordinator) Contact ANYTIME!
1976 Ford Elite "Lola Mae"
97 Suzuki Intruder 1400
US Army Retired
Back to Top
bata747-8 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Honorary Spam Bot / Zombie Account

Joined: 24-June-2010
Location: China
Status: Offline
Points: 131
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote bata747-8 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-December-2014 at 6:39PM
Originally posted by aquartlow aquartlow wrote:

Originally posted by Billy C Billy C wrote:

Kind of off topic but how can the rear end be aligned without adjustable links? I know the factory had slightly eccentric bushing sleeves of some sort but with polyurethane bushings I don't think it's the same.

 
Billy C,
 I had to elongate the upper/lower control arm bolt hole brackets on the rear axle (drivers side toward the rear, passenger side toward the front), re-install the upper/lower control arms with longer grade 8 bolts through HD 1/8" thick washers on each side of the factory upper/lower control arm brackets. Once positioned "square" in the chassis(with ratchet straps) and had same offset on each side using a string line, I tacked, then welded the washers in place on the brackets after removing the arms so I didn't burn up my urethane bushings. No more "dog-legging". Using a string line on each side before "squaring", one string touched the passenger side tire but the other was off the driver's side about 1.5" or so. I apologize for being off topic and/or taking up space on this thread explaining my situation/remedy.


Would the Sphon rear arm set have allowed you to solve this same problem without welding washers or other actions?
Forum Test Account

(formerly a spam bot account)
Back to Top
californiajohnny View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 05-October-2013
Location: winlock, wa
Status: Offline
Points: 14606
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote californiajohnny Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-December-2014 at 7:14PM
for what it worth... i too saw that eccentric bushing in the factory shop manual, but when i tore my 74 apart(original rotten rubber bushings) there was no eccentric anywhere on any of the rear arms!
JOHN
74 GRAN TORINO S&H CLONE
74 VETTE CUSTOM
90 S10 BLAZER 4X4 LIFTED
77 CELICA CUSTOM
75 V8 MONZA SUPERCHARGED
79 COURIER VERT. SLAMMED
75 VEGA V6 5 SPD
70 CHEV C10 P/U
68 MUSTANG FB CONVERSION
Back to Top
Big Bird View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 25-August-2013
Location: New York
Status: Offline
Points: 4194
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Big Bird Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-January-2015 at 5:37PM
Feb 2007 hot rod magazine 51 merc with Banjo Mathews NASCAR clip...

Strut rods with adjusting sleeves like tie rods have.

"What we do in full frontal view, is more honest than your cleaned-up mind."
Randy
1979 T-Bird
2005 F-150 STX RCSB 4.6, 3.55 LSD
How the Heck does a REGULAR CAB SHORTBED weigh over 5200 pounds?
Back to Top
californiajohnny View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 05-October-2013
Location: winlock, wa
Status: Offline
Points: 14606
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote californiajohnny Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-January-2015 at 6:33PM
i like the boxed lower control arms, i thought about doing that to mine but you would have to cut out a large hole for the shock and two for the strut rod bolts- so i didn't, but this still looks tempting
JOHN
74 GRAN TORINO S&H CLONE
74 VETTE CUSTOM
90 S10 BLAZER 4X4 LIFTED
77 CELICA CUSTOM
75 V8 MONZA SUPERCHARGED
79 COURIER VERT. SLAMMED
75 VEGA V6 5 SPD
70 CHEV C10 P/U
68 MUSTANG FB CONVERSION
Back to Top
lynchster View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 07-January-2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Status: Offline
Points: 2150
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote lynchster Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-January-2015 at 3:07PM
Nice work on the strut rods. I've got to replace mine and have been considering something like this since finding replacements in better shape than mine is probably not going to happen. 
Chuck
72 Gran Torino Sport
13 Taurus SHO "Mr Pig"
Back to Top
Eliteman76 View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group


Joined: 20-March-2006
Location: Nebraska, USA
Status: Offline
Points: 5044
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Eliteman76 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-January-2015 at 6:04PM
Eccentric bushings on the rear axle lower arms from my understanding are a 72-73 thing. Not sure to be honest I've seen it on the 74-76 cars. It's detailed in the chassis book in 72 and 73.

Concerning the rods, my issue still stand of a failure of the OEM rods.
I've pulled a few out and surprise! rusted bad enough they went to the scrap pile.

As far as our cars go, with the new joint, in effect doesn't that turn the lower arm into effectively a large "A" arm?
Bill {CDMBill} over on Bangshift runs his Mustang and a few years back had a strut rod failure from a poly bushing. Snapped the factory rod. I'm waiting to hear back from him about his setup, thinking he used a total control replacement.







Edited by Eliteman76 - 19-January-2015 at 6:04PM
Andrew:GTS.ORG admin, '72 Q code 5 speed Restomod
Pondering: #99Problems
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.