Print Page | Close Window

Seating a C6 Torque converter

Printed From: The Ford Torino Page
Category: Model Specific Forum
Forum Name: 1972-1976 Ford and Mercury
Forum Description: Technical discussion for 1972-1976 Ford and Mercury
URL: http://forum.grantorinosport.org/forum_posts.asp?TID=17497
Printed Date: 13-December-2018 at 6:32PM
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Seating a C6 Torque converter
Posted By: 72FordGTS
Subject: Seating a C6 Torque converter
Date Posted: 29-September-2018 at 12:05PM
I am trying to seat the torque converter for my C6. I seem to be only getting two thanks, I can't get a third clunk. It's a new converter. I put a straight edge across the front and the studs are well back from the bell housing edge. I measured roughly 0.9" from the bell housing edge to the stud bosses. The centre of the converter is slightly forward of the bell housing edge.

I also rotated the converter and pulled it and it seems to be moving the pump. I can see the pumps flat edges they seem to move if I turn the converter and then remove it.

So I tried connecting the trans to the engine. It seemed somewhat stubborn to get them to mate and the bell housing bolts had to be used to get it to make oksy. Once it did, it seems like everything mated okay but there didn't seem to be any real free play from the converter to the flexplate. I uncoupled them to check the converter again and it will not seat any further.

I also saw this chart which shows the clearance should be 1 1/8" for a C6. I am only .9" roughly.

http://www.tciauto.com/tc/auto-trans-faq/#4" rel="nofollow - http://www.tciauto.com/tc/auto-trans-faq/#4

Any advice?


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car



Replies:
Posted By: aquartlow
Date Posted: 29-September-2018 at 1:15PM
Vince,
 Has the front pump been taken apart/removed from the C6 case, could have installed the pump's drive gear backwards/upside down. There is a taper to the pump gear that should face out to allow easier installation of TC. The TC should be back from face of bell housing 13/16" up to a 351 CI and 360CI and larger engines have 1 1/8" space between bell housing face and converter stud "pads".  Also make sure the transmission's TC input shaft is fully seated within the transmission, it should sit "proud" of stator support about 1.375". When fully seated, you can't quite get the tips of your fingers between the back of converter and the bell housing. Hope this helps.


-------------
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires.

No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t.

Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone.


Posted By: californiajohnny
Date Posted: 29-September-2018 at 1:38PM
 yes like todd said. DO NOT use the bolts to draw the bellhousing up to the engine!!! if the converter isn't back all the way drawing it up can break the pump drive!!! ConfusedOuch did that years ago with a turbo 350 Confused

-------------
JOHN
74 GRAN TORINO S&H CLONE
74 VETTE CUSTOM
90 S10 BLAZER 4X4 LIFTED
77 CELICA CUSTOM
75 V8 MONZA SUPERCHARGED
79 COURIER VERT. SLAMMED
75 VEGA V6 5 SPD
70 CHEV C10 P/U
68 MUSTANG FB CONVERSION


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 29-September-2018 at 2:46PM
some are a royal Censored bitch to get the last step

jerk the converter sideways with the studs while lifting and gently pushing

if you don't have a gap between the converter and the flex, it's not in

if the converter meets the flex before the trans housing meets the block, it's not in

 Exclamation AND DEFINITELY NO CRANKING BOLTS! Exclamation

if it's a tough one you'll need to do it out in the open / not under the car. use one of the inspection plate cover bolt holes to bolt on an offset combo wrench to hold the converter in until you have the trans 99% up in the tunnel before you remove it, very easy to have the converter slip out a step when you don't notice it. or you can make a piece of metal to act as a retainer that you can leave in place until you know You're Golden

also, mind the drain plug into the hole in the flex ;)



-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 29-September-2018 at 3:38PM
The trans was fully rebuilt by an experienced builder so I can only assume the pump was done correctly. The TC is .940" from the bell housing to the mounting bosses. I removed the new converter and installed the old and it was the same spec.

I tried reinstalling a few times and it seemed like I got three engagements. I think before the first two were happening together. It is in there solid no play and tight, it can't get it on further, but I can just get the tips of my fingers behind it.

Todd on those measurements you gave, where would a 400 fall? It's essentially identical to a 351M so does it use the bigger spec or smaller? Also how do you make that measurement on the input shaft? Mine did come loose once when I pulled the TC but I was sure to make sure it was fully seated before I reinstalled.

I measured front the back of the block to the flex plate and it seems to be about the same as the TC measurement. It is hard to get a proper measurement because the flex plate has a raised edge between the ring gear and the mounting holes. I should mention this is a new flexplate too, so it could be the problem.

When I did have them together it seemed like it fit with zero clearance. I did use the bolts to help mate it better, but it was only because the angles were a little off and I couldn't get it any better. It felt like the TC pilot was a little off center and the bolts just line things up and it "popped" in place. Hopefully it did no damage. I saw the drain bolt and it was through the flexplate hole.

I will try and get this together outside the car and install as a unit. Always two steps forward and one back....

-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 29-September-2018 at 3:54PM
have you test fitted the converter to the engine / flex by itself?

check / massage the pilot for burrs ...

also there's a long & short spline on the input shaft, IDK which way it goes for sure ATM

it may be close but the converter studs need to be loose and able to rock back & forth in the holes,

you can't bind the pump between the motor & trans

block plate in place?



-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: aquartlow
Date Posted: 29-September-2018 at 4:24PM
Vince,
 It sounds like it is installed correctly, even though the measurement seems a bit shallow. The 351M/400 uses the same C6 transmission case as a 429/460 C6, so the TC stud boss to bell housing face measurement should be closer to 1.125". That said, just as long as you didn't have to crank on the TC nuts to seat the TC into the crankshaft's pilot hole and there wasn't any binding as you turned the engine to gain access to the TC nuts, You should be good to go. When I re-installed my C6 after TC and servo lever changes, I had roughly 3/16-1/4" between flex plate and TC stud mounting bosses. The TC studs came through the flex plate about 1/4-3/8" just enough to start the 3/8-24 nuts. As you tighten the TC nuts it will naturally pull the TC toward engine block and take up the 3/16-1/4" distance, this distance keeps the TC hub from bottoming out inside the stator. I measured the input shaft "stick-out" where it extends out of the stator support.   


-------------
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires.

No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t.

Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone.


Posted By: californiajohnny
Date Posted: 29-September-2018 at 4:51PM
^^^ what those guys said!!!
you said you have a new flex plate... how does it compare with your old one???
IIRC joe had an issue with his new flex plate!!!??


-------------
JOHN
74 GRAN TORINO S&H CLONE
74 VETTE CUSTOM
90 S10 BLAZER 4X4 LIFTED
77 CELICA CUSTOM
75 V8 MONZA SUPERCHARGED
79 COURIER VERT. SLAMMED
75 VEGA V6 5 SPD
70 CHEV C10 P/U
68 MUSTANG FB CONVERSION


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 2:26AM
Thanks guys. Hopefully I have some time to work on it today. I would say there was no play between the studs and the flexplate. It was a snug fit, so something isn't right. When I turned over the engine there was no slop between the studs and the holes.

I do have the block plate in place. I don't have my original flexplate anymore, it went with my engine but never came back because it came with a new one. I don't think it's a high end flexplate, just an EnginePro brand. Looking at my receipt, it was only about $40. I wish I never sent my original with the motor.

I also did fit the converter to the flexplate it fits great. I just think the clearances seem too tight too me.

-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 7:32AM
all i know is, i got learned that the converter needs to come out of the pump to meet the flex.

if the converter don't wiggle with the trans fully mated to the motor, sump'n ain't right.

you're sure the flex isn't on backwards?

can you snap a pic of the gap / or lack thereof at a converter stud?


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 8:38AM
I assembled the engine and trans out of the car a few times, and it went together easy.  I was able to slide it into them together with easy by hand. I think yesterday, the reason for the stiff connection was the studs or the pilot was a tad off the holes.
 
Once they were connected, with just a few loose bolts there was some play at the stud.  I could move the stud in the hole.  However, when I snugged the bell housing bolts, the slack went away.  I could no longer move the stud by hand and there seemed to be zero play.  It didn't seem to bind or anything, there was just no more play.  Turning over the engine was just as easy as if the transmission was not connected.  It just seems like there is zero play, and I am not sure if that is okay.
 
According to this site, Ford transmissions should be 1" from the mounting bosses to the bell housing with a .050 tolerance.  At .945" I am pretty much on spec for that site.  Maybe I am just being overly picky, but I don't want to tear this out of the car or mess up my transmission pump.
 
https://transmissioncenter.net/shop/torque-converter-installation-instructions/" rel="nofollow - https://transmissioncenter.net/shop/torque-converter-installation-instructions/
 
Here are some pics:
 
This is the stud, with the bell housing bolts tight:
 
 
 
 
This is the stud when it has play and the bell housing is just loosely fitted together by hand:
 
 
 
 
 
 


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: aquartlow
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 9:12AM
Vince,
 All looks good in the pics Thumbs Up, but the problem is it all has to come back out, you forgot to install the torque converter seal...………..gotcha LOL.
 
Some websites state <1" (B&M) some 1 1/8" (TCI), I guess it really comes down to TC manufacturer design/measurements.


-------------
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires.

No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t.

Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone.


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 9:52AM
measure the stud protrusion, snug down 2 nuts across from each other and measure the stud protrusion again to see if the converter pulled to the flex ...

could be a cheezy flex, $40 is a good jobber price before several rebox / rebrandings, does your paperwork show a part number for the flex?

and Yes converter snout heights vary from maker to maker Wacko


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 10:17AM
here's a flexplate listing i use, http://www.bulkpart.com/2/category/FLYford.html" rel="nofollow - http://www.bulkpart.com/2/category/FLYford.html

F201 should be correct for your engine trans combo D1AZ-6375-A

F205 might be the CJ flex D1ZZ-6375-A

F220 has the correct diameter w/weight, but also 302? E1TZ-6375C

but the first thing that stands out is the F200 flex,

Flywheel, Ford C5 / AOD, 289, 302, 351 engines
Reference OEM # E0AZ-6375A, 14.23 inch diameter, w/weight
Fits some C4, C5, AOD & FMX transmissions.
Will NOT fit a C6!

both times i've swapped out an FMX for a C6 i used the FMX flex and they were perfect

Vince what Ford PN does the master list call out for your car?




-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 11:39AM
FWIW i'd source a quality / reputable mfg'r flex and see if it clearances better

is this the POS you have there?

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/atp-z106/overview/" rel="nofollow - https://www.summitracing.com/parts/atp-z106/overview/


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 1:08PM
Originally posted by aquartlow aquartlow wrote:

Vince,
 All looks good in the pics Thumbs Up, but the problem is it all has to come back out, you forgot to install the torque converter seal...………..gotcha LOL.
 
Some websites state <1" (B&M) some 1 1/8" (TCI), I guess it really comes down to TC manufacturer design/measurements.
 
Haha Todd, you had me going for a second.  I have a feeling I am overthinking this and like you said it's probably good.  I just don't want to mess things up after investing so much time and money. It's been a long time since I have done this kind of work.
 
Originally posted by Rockatansky Rockatansky wrote:

measure the stud protrusion, snug down 2 nuts across from each other and measure the stud protrusion again to see if the converter pulled to the flex ...
 
I did this and it didn't really seem to have any noticeable change.  It seems like there is basically no play, but nothing is too tight or binding.  I'd feel more comfortable if there was a small amount of play. 
 
Originally posted by Rockatansky Rockatansky wrote:

Vince what Ford PN does the master list call out for your car?
 
The Parts Master Catalog shows D1AZ 6375-A
 
Originally posted by Rockatansky Rockatansky wrote:

FWIW i'd source a quality / reputable mfg'r flex and see if it clearances better
is this the POS you have there?
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/atp-z106/overview/" rel="nofollow -
 
I might look into a better quality aftermarket unit and check the clearances.  Any recommendations on what is a decent one?  Most I looked at just seem to be listed for all small block Ford.
 
The converter I have is a Transtar FM127 converter.  My builder said he used that brand for many years and never had issues.  FWIW, the clearances on the OEM converter were identical to this new converter.
 
 


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 1:13PM
the only problem i see with beginning at smack flush is it's going heat up and change things, jamming the pump

not to mention crank thrust and that will grow slightly after fire-up too

does your trans guy make house calls?




-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 1:22PM
Yeah, good point.  I think I may give my trans guy a call and see what he says. 
 
In the mean time, do you have any suggestions if I decide to order a new flex plate?


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 1:29PM
he may even have a stash of flexies to compare Wink

you like the comfort of the easy return with your local guy so see what he's pushing this week?

Summit has few to pick from, SFI / non-SFI ...



-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 1:45PM

I am pretty sure my local guy is good on returns.  I may even pick his brain as he has build all kinds of engines and cars over the years. 

Why is there a difference for a 351M/400 flex to a 351C?  Both have the same diameter and counter weight?  So what's the difference?
 
This video shows some difference in the Ford flexplates, although not specifically relevant to my situation.
 


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 1:54PM
leave it to Ford to NOT standardize the crank flange to rear block face offset,

i'm sure it was good for the economy though ...

how do you feel about getting an offset dimension if you separate it again?

from the block plate would be fine :)


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: californiajohnny
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 2:04PM
 he talks about swapping an AOD... when i did mine, only difference i noticed was the drain plug was on the opposite side of the stud 302/aod vs 531w/fmx which he didn't even mention...

-------------
JOHN
74 GRAN TORINO S&H CLONE
74 VETTE CUSTOM
90 S10 BLAZER 4X4 LIFTED
77 CELICA CUSTOM
75 V8 MONZA SUPERCHARGED
79 COURIER VERT. SLAMMED
75 VEGA V6 5 SPD
70 CHEV C10 P/U
68 MUSTANG FB CONVERSION


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 2:19PM
I realize that it was a different application, just showing the so many variations Ford had in this stuff!  Just curious too if the 351C had a different offset from the 400, which may give me some more play.  the OEM replacement shows a 400 a 201 and the 351C a 202 flexplate.  
Then you look at the hi-po aftermarket stuff and they are the same for all small blocks with 28oz weights.  289-400, same listings.  Ford NEVER makes anything easy....
 
I will make some calls, and I in all likelihood will have to separate it again. I will update later. Thanks for all the advice..


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 2:20PM
multiply the confabulation, converter offset, ring gear offset and drain plug hole

what else ... weights as he pointed out, 50oz, 28oz, none

and don't forget converter bolt pattern, 10.5" and 11.4 for 'same' applications

when i had access to the pile-O-flex's we determined that the AOD's were also the same as the FMX / C6's

things must change often & w/o notice in the Ford engineering section


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: californiajohnny
Date Posted: 30-September-2018 at 3:30PM
yeah that's the thing i've always disliked about ford... the lack of interchangeability or confusion!Confused


-------------
JOHN
74 GRAN TORINO S&H CLONE
74 VETTE CUSTOM
90 S10 BLAZER 4X4 LIFTED
77 CELICA CUSTOM
75 V8 MONZA SUPERCHARGED
79 COURIER VERT. SLAMMED
75 VEGA V6 5 SPD
70 CHEV C10 P/U
68 MUSTANG FB CONVERSION


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 01-October-2018 at 11:45AM
So I called my transmission guy and he said there needs to be play. His only suggestion was that the converter may have a hard time seating in the pump drive so to tap the pilot with a rubber mallet to see if it will go in any further. Otherwise he says that it's probably the flex plate.

I contacted Pioneer out of curiosity to see the difference between the FRA201 AND FRA202 plates. He claims the only difference is the weight not the offset? I thought 351C and 351M/400 both used a 28 oz weight?

Anyway I will pull it apart when I have time and check it again.

-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: californiajohnny
Date Posted: 01-October-2018 at 12:10PM
hmm, that could be a possibility being all new... could be a little tight and or a burr on the new surfaces???


-------------
JOHN
74 GRAN TORINO S&H CLONE
74 VETTE CUSTOM
90 S10 BLAZER 4X4 LIFTED
77 CELICA CUSTOM
75 V8 MONZA SUPERCHARGED
79 COURIER VERT. SLAMMED
75 VEGA V6 5 SPD
70 CHEV C10 P/U
68 MUSTANG FB CONVERSION


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 01-October-2018 at 2:03PM
351C is 28.x imbalance same as 302C, 351M, 400 and 351W

and Windsor based 302 before they changed to 50 oz


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 02-October-2018 at 12:36AM
Originally posted by californiajohnny californiajohnny wrote:

hmm, that could be a possibility being all new... could be a little tight and or a burr on the new surfaces???
 
I will inspect for a bur when I take it apart.  He mentioned something about the fact that I might not be fully seated into the pump drive.  He just told me that it is the TC not being seated 99% of the time.
Originally posted by Rockatansky Rockatansky wrote:

351C is 28.x imbalance same as 302C, 351M, 400 and 351W

and Windsor based 302 before they changed to 50 oz
 
That's what I thought.  So I am not sure why the Pioneer guy said that there is a different weight between the 351C and 351M/400 flexplates?  I think he just didn't want to answer my questions or didn't know the answer. 
 
I did find this thread which shows that the TCI flexplate has the mounting pads closer to the engine.  So it might work.  Form looking at Summit's website, it seems to be a pretty universal fit, fits the C4, C6, and the Windsor and 335 series engines.  Maybe that's why it has more spacing, so it fits all applications.  If I can do a return, I might try it out.  Too bad it's so pricey.
 
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/clevelands/flexplate-dimensions-help-please-t9792.html" rel="nofollow - https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/clevelands/flexplate-dimensions-help-please-t9792.html


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 03-October-2018 at 9:43AM
So to update, I got a factory Ford C6 flexplate from a 302 to test for fit. I tried it out and it is the exact same as the aftermarket plate. I can wiggle the studs until I snug the bell housing bolts and then it's too tight to wiggle.

I also tried seating the converter with the rubber mallet and it didn't move at all. So I am thinking the problem is likely the transmission.

Is there any reason the converter wouldn't seat as far back as it should? I don't know what the best course of action is from here. I am pretty sure I could use a c4 style flex to gain the clearance but I am concerned that there may be an issue with the trans build causing the converter to sit out too far.

-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 03-October-2018 at 2:53PM
do you still have the original converter?

set them side by side upside down on their snouts and compare the stud pad heights


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 04-October-2018 at 11:51AM
Yeah, I still have the original TC.  They are pretty much identical stand them on the snouts.  I did try to reseat the original TC and it is tighter in the bell housing than my new converter for my fingers.  I can't get my finger tips with the OEM unit, but I can just get the tips with this Transtar converter.  It seems though that it's just the size of the "donut" is slightly smaller on the new one, because when I measured the mounting pads to the bell housing they were with in 20 thousands of each, and both were under an inch.
I pulled out the instructions from my Broader kit and he does talk about torque converter clearances.  Here is what he says:  "When you're ready to install your transmission, you must check your converter to flex plate clearance.  Failure to make this check is the responsibility of the installer.  Improper clearance can lead to transmission and/or converter failure.  You will have no one to blame but yourself"
 
He goes on to say the best way to measure the clearance is to measure a TC stud with a micrometer or dial caliper before the nuts are installed.  Then snug the nuts and measure the stud length again.  "The difference between the two measurements is the clearance.  The clearance should be between .080" and .190".  If the clearance is larger, you can place washers between the flex place and the converter on the studs. If it is too tight, contact the converter builder for their advice."
 
So reading this, I have 0 clearance which is obviously a no-no.  I just wish he offered a better solution for too little clearance, too much would be easy to fix.
 
I called the trans builder again and I am going to have him look over the transmission and check my converter install.  If it all checks out, I think I either have to find a flex plate with more clearance or change my converter.  I think the TCI flex may offer a bit more clearance, and it looks like  a 164 tooth C4 flex has an offset that would give me more clearance.  I am not sure if I can return this converter anymore, since I did put some fluid in it.  I am also not sure how good a Transtar converter is.  My builder said he used them all the time and hasn't had issues, but his shop was mostly stock rebuilds.  Hopefully I can get this sorted out sooner than later and finally get this install done.


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 04-October-2018 at 1:06PM
look at the flats on the snout hubs ;)

i have a B&M Holeshot here i'll probably never use


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 05-October-2018 at 12:13AM
I checked the flats. They look good on both TCs. I think they are fully seating, but for whatever reason my transmission just won't seat as deep as it should. If my trans builder can't figure it out, I might call Broader.

Thanks for the offer on the B&M. I will let you know if I need it.

-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: aquartlow
Date Posted: 05-October-2018 at 10:20AM
Vince,
 Try these guys for C6 info, may be helpful. I have received great info from members Gregaust and Stuart40a as well as others. Hope this helps.
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/fordtransmissionforum/" rel="nofollow - https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/fordtransmissionforum/


-------------
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires.

No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t.

Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone.


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 05-October-2018 at 10:50AM
the length of the flats are the same, seems the end of the flat is where the converter stops going into the pump?

also check how the input shaft is able to engage the converter, measure from the snout to the end of the input shaft in each converter ...

spitballing but you might find something


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 05-October-2018 at 12:21PM
Originally posted by aquartlow aquartlow wrote:

Vince,
 Try these guys for C6 info, may be helpful. I have received great info from members Gregaust and Stuart40a as well as others. Hope this helps.
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/fordtransmissionforum/" rel="nofollow -
Originally posted by Rockatansky Rockatansky wrote:

the length of the flats are the same, seems the end of the flat is where the converter stops going into the pump?

also check how the input shaft is able to engage the converter, measure from the snout to the end of the input shaft in each converter ...
spitballing but you might find something
 
Thanks Rock, I appreciate your help. 
 
I had the day off work today so I took the trans and both converters to my builder.  He confirmed, I did have it seated correctly.  We took a bunch of measurements and the Transtar unit doesn't fit as well as my old factory unit.  He thinks the new TC was out on a few dimensions (he pulled the input shaft and fit it into both converters too).  The factory TC does fit a bit better but I reinstalled it to the engine and flex and I maybe have .020 clearance using the stud for measurement. My builder agreed it's too tight and thought it was strange since most of the parts were used together from before.
 
So the Transtar converter is going back.  I sent an email to Broader and see if he has one that will work. His are pricey, but I know they are good good.    I may be able to try out a TCI unit from the local speed shop too. 
 
I will post on the trans forum to see if they have any ideas too.  Thanks for the help guys. 


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 05-October-2018 at 1:01PM
it'd cost more to send mine from here than it would to buy a new Holesh*t there

glad you found a good local guy that didn't just tell you to P off!

i still suspect the flex is Dong Wang spec


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 07-October-2018 at 2:38PM
So I think I figure out the problem with the transmission.  After positing on the transmission forum, they were able to help me examine the pump (without disassembly) and it looks like the pump gear might be in backwards.  So Todd gets bonus points for making that call way back at the start of the tread.
When I looked really closely with a light, I could see the chamfered edge (circled in red) on the gear is on the back side of the gear, not the front side like it should be.  When I talked to my builder last week he did say at one point "Maybe I installed the gear backwards by accident."  So, I will have to bring it back to him and have him correct it.  And hopefully this fixes the problem.
 
 
Now that I sent back the Transtar TC, does anyone have any recommendations?  I could get another Transstar, or I know I can get B&M or TCI locally from the speed shop.  I also could get a Broader converter, I sent him an email for a recommendation.


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 07-October-2018 at 2:51PM
meet me in Chicago, bang! bang!

kudos for figuring it out and not 'sending it'


-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: californiajohnny
Date Posted: 07-October-2018 at 3:05PM
Shocked yeah that would make a difference!!! that's why you didn't feel the 3rd drop in Wink


-------------
JOHN
74 GRAN TORINO S&H CLONE
74 VETTE CUSTOM
90 S10 BLAZER 4X4 LIFTED
77 CELICA CUSTOM
75 V8 MONZA SUPERCHARGED
79 COURIER VERT. SLAMMED
75 VEGA V6 5 SPD
70 CHEV C10 P/U
68 MUSTANG FB CONVERSION


Posted By: aquartlow
Date Posted: 07-October-2018 at 3:27PM
Vince,
 First, glad to hear you got it figured out, at least it is a relatively easy fix. That said and not trying to throw up any red flags or darts at your trans builder, but I would want him to go over that trans with a fine toothed comb and verify any and all necessary clearances since he now has to re-open it(pull stator/pump and oil pan). While the pump/stator is out have your builder to make sure the pump bushing is installed in the correct orientation, here's an image:
http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiSh7X54fXdAhWHmlkKHYVRAj8QjRx6BAgBEAU&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.429-460.com%2Ft13872-c6-pump-bushing-install&psig=AOvVaw2Jp6kLf_PMC8iGFn0JGtbF&ust=1539050996048517" rel="nofollow">Image result for ford c6 pump bushing
 
Good luck and hopefully 2nd times the charm and a 3rd trip isn't required.
 


-------------
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires.

No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t.

Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone.


Posted By: 72GTS351CJ
Date Posted: 08-October-2018 at 4:06AM
Glad its figured out. I've been following this for 2 weeks now

-------------
72GTS Clint Eastwood Special                                     


Posted By: mkshelton
Date Posted: 08-October-2018 at 1:35PM
Kudos for being patient and not just git r dun

-------------
"Sometimes I wonder if I'm actually UNinventing the wheel"


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 12-October-2018 at 2:04PM
So to update this thread, it's all fixed. I stopped by the transmission guy's place this week and he fixed it immediately.  He had a trick to pulling the front pump without removing any other parts, so it took him literally less than 10 minutes to fix the gear.  He was very apologetic about the mistake.  He told me that when he was finishing up the transmission he had just had shoulder surgery and so he had a helper with him.  He said he told the helper to install the gears but he trusted he knew the correct way, which he obviously didn't.
In any case with the gear flipped around, the TC seated further back into the transmission and I had about 1.1" to the mounting pads.  I checked it on the engine and the clearance was within Broader's specs, being .110".   
 
For anyone reading this in the future, the converter pilot should not hit a straight edge across the bell housing if the pump gear is installed correctly.  If the pump gear is installed backwards, like mine was, the converter pilot sticks out just beyond a straight edge across the bell housing. 
 
Thanks for all the help!


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car


Posted By: californiajohnny
Date Posted: 12-October-2018 at 2:10PM
Clap crap if you'd have mentioned the straight edge part... i 'd have told you something's wrong at the tranny not the engine side of things... that much i do know. glad you got it figured out


-------------
JOHN
74 GRAN TORINO S&H CLONE
74 VETTE CUSTOM
90 S10 BLAZER 4X4 LIFTED
77 CELICA CUSTOM
75 V8 MONZA SUPERCHARGED
79 COURIER VERT. SLAMMED
75 VEGA V6 5 SPD
70 CHEV C10 P/U
68 MUSTANG FB CONVERSION


Posted By: 72GTS351CJ
Date Posted: 12-October-2018 at 2:13PM
Wow! 1 little mistake caused so much aggravation. Glad its done

-------------
72GTS Clint Eastwood Special                                     


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 12-October-2018 at 3:32PM
what converter now?



-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 13-October-2018 at 12:06PM
The Transtar unit hadn't shipped yet, so we tried it out after the pump was fixed and it was okay. So I am just going to use it.  The guys on the transmission forum seem to think it's a decent converter, and I think the stall speed should be just right.

-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 11.10 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2017 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net