![]() |
1972 Thunderbird Suspension Rebuild |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
1972Bird
New Member
Joined: 04-August-2021 Location: Blaine, WA Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: 1972 Thunderbird Suspension RebuildPosted: 06-August-2021 at 5:57AM |
|
Suspension rebuild is what I am working on right now and torque the bushings with the car on it's wheels at ride height is what I have heard and did also. It took me a long time to understand this because stock suspension bushings are not a major topic of interest to most people and I had always just assumed they rotated on the bolt. Not so and even poly bushings apparently(?) rotate around the inner metal sleeve but the bolt pinches the sleeve hard to the chassis. Not to hijack this thread but I will offer a few comments on suspension work instead of starting a new thread, since this one is the most recent and others might be searching this topic: 1. I used Moog ball joints and like another member of the forum indicated some time ago, they did not fit into the lower control arm. I used a mini angle grinder with sanding wheel to shave off a little bit of metal around the edges where it was catching the arm. The gauge of the metal Moog uses is probably a bit thicker than stock and other suppliers so I don't see this as an issue of "bad quality" but rather just the way it is with aftermarket parts. 2. For the upper control arms the Moog rubber boot was not easy to take on/off and had to be put on after the joint is mounted in the arm. The other member couldn't get the boot off and tried to install the joint with it on. That won't work and it's OK to put in on after the joint is in place. The spindle will keep it on. 3. Grease the ball joints on the bench before installing. You don't know how long the joint has been sitting on a shelf and the grease that came out of mine looked a bit sketchy. 4. I ended up using an eBay/Amazon Upper Control Arm bushing installation tool set (looks like a glorified C-clamp) for both Upper and Lower control arms. Costs around $60. If you use a hydraulic press then you need to make spacers that support the inside of the control arms to keep them from deflecting. Ask me how I know this...... 5. There is a multi-piece Ford tool for using a press on the Upper arms. I could not find one (hence the Amazon tool kit) and I did not realize it at the time but it must also set the correct angle of the pivot shaft while you are installing the bushes. The pivot shaft and the inner sleeve of the bushes are both serrated, so they lock together once the bushings are fully installed. Without that Ford tool you need a way to make sure the pivot shaft/bushes are in the correct rotational orientation to each other, otherwise you will pre-load the bushes and that will shorten their lifespan. I did not understand this at first and had not measured them or made a quick tool alignment before dismantling the arm, so I had to leave the bushings slightly apart from the pivot arm and hope that tightening the pivot shaft nuts would press them in fully. We'll see if that holds. 6. The UCA pivot shaft special lock nuts are weird size and thread so I couldn't find them anywhere. Don't loose them or it looks like you have to buy the whole pivot arm kit (approx $100). 7. Rear lower control arm bushes are too big a diameter for the Amazon tool kit so you have to use a hydraulic press or cobble together some kind of homemade tool using appropriate size steel pipes/sockets/muffler adapters and threaded rod. I have a press so I cut a flat washer the correct OD from some 1/2" plate off-cut I had and bought a 2.5" to 2.5" exhaust pipe coupler from O'Reillys for $3.60. I was able to get the old bushes out and noticed they are the original style with the oversized sleeve and metal "clip" that can be rotated to adjust pinion angle. The Mevotech MS40485 replacement bushes are the wrong size (Thanks Rockauto for listing the wrong part....) so thanks to a lot of research and information learned from this forum I have ordered Moog 8135 bushes. I hope they work but I understand they do not have provision for the pinion adjust clips and apparently those have not been available for many many years now. Bummer, but it makes me wonder why. I have no experience in this area but perhaps the pinion angle can be changed some other way and Ford was just being anal during the design? I'm keeping the old bushes and the clips so a future project may be to look for a bushing that has the correct dimensions including the larger diameter sleeve, so that I can re-use the metal pinion adjust clips. If pinion angle becomes a problem then I expect the only practical solution is adjustable control arms such as the Spohn units. 8. Apparently rear upper control arm bushes have been NLA for a long time. Once I get my bottom arms taken care of I will pull the uppers and measure them to try and find some suitable rubber replacements. Yes, I know I could install poly, but I've read they won't last due to the twisting motion rear control arms experience. Also, I want rubber. It's a 5000lb T-bird, not a sports car. Smoothness and low NVH is the goal for me. That's all I've got for now. Cheers, James |
|
|
1972 Thunderbird
429 A/C only with manual windows and doors, no vinyl top! |
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06-August-2021 at 9:27AM |
|
Have you found out by chance if the mid sized Fords have the same rear control arms? Those are available by a great aftermarket company that built them with Delrin and spherical bearings. I plan for those, about $450 a set IIRC.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
Big Bird
Senior Member
Joined: 25-August-2013 Location: New York Status: Offline Points: 4195 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06-August-2021 at 11:44AM |
|
If the question is if the 72-76 Thunderbird/Mark IV uses the same rear lower control arm as the Torino chassis, the answer is yes. Same rear suspension, rear axle assemblies swap. Same goes for the front suspension. Remember of course, 72 and some 73s have weird early parts.
|
|
|
"What we do in full frontal view, is more honest than your cleaned-up mind."
Randy 1979 T-Bird 2005 F-150 STX RCSB 4.6, 3.55 LSD How the Heck does a REGULAR CAB SHORTBED weigh over 5200 pounds? |
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06-August-2021 at 3:19PM |
|
Thanks, I knew they looked the same, as many as I used to see in local yards I went to. It's good that they can swap, those aftermarket control arms are very special.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
1972Bird
New Member
Joined: 04-August-2021 Location: Blaine, WA Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-August-2021 at 11:36AM |
|
Hi All, Just to be a contrarian I can now report my 72 Tbird does NOT have the same lower control arms as a Torino. I say that not because I have an actual Torino part to compare with but because both sets of bushings I ordered from Rockauto (Mevotech MS404085 and Moog K8135) were the wrong size (Outside diameter too small). In fact those two bushings are identical and have the same Harris Silentbloc rubber part number molded in. In the factory service manual they look the same but that doesn't really mean anything. Maybe there is a "heavy duty" Torino part that matches the T-Bird? It makes sense to me that the heavier car would have larger diameter bushings. That might be the onl;y difference and FWIW, the center to center distance of my LCA bushings is just over 20". Anybody know what the Torino unit is? I found a PDF file of a Moog part number cross reference list on Pirate 4x4.com and by comparing that to the actual dimensions of my OEM bushings I found a likely suspect in Moog K8205. Unfortunately it is listed as "obsolete" and of course none of the usual suppliers stocks them. Several hours of internet research later I found Rare Parts P/N 15267. Four of them cost me $155 delivered. My backside still hurts but at least they look decent and most importantly they fit. What is very interesting is that the RP bushings come with the correct ID sleeve (roughly .75") to accept the OEM metal clip that allows for pinion adjustment. RP don't provide the clip and assume you don't have one, so they install a plain metal sleeve to properly accept the standard 9/16" chassis bolt. Too bad nobody seems to offer the metal clip as it looks pretty simple, although I expect it is some sort spring grade steel so not the easiest to form. I was able to tap out the clips from my old bushings, tap out RP spacer sleeve and install the clips. One was a bit rusty but should be OK and if I can find a mechanic with the Ford adjustment tool then I can get my pinion angle set up per factory spec. I did the driver's side arm last night and reinstalled it but now I'm stuck getting the Upper control arm off because the axle seems to want to pull back from the chassis even though I've got both chassis and axle up on stands. I had the same issue getting the LCA off and put a bit of damage on the bolt threads, so now I'm more cautious. In fact getting the LCA back on was a challenge and I had to use a "come a long" to pull the axle in so the bolt could be inserted without further damage. Unfortunately there's not enough enough room to use it for the Upper arm, so today I picked up some small turnbuckles from the hardware store and will see if I can rig up something using wire rope or chain. Once I get the UCA off I will measure the original bushing and use the Moog reference list to source replacements. I will also post what I find in case it is helpful to others. Again, I want rubber for my car so I'm sticking with OEM style bushes, but with the high cost of Rare parts those Sphone arms are looking pretty attractive..... I should at least be gratefull somebody has what I need since my car is poorly supported in the parts department. On the custom control arm topic I got a little sidetracked this weekend and discovered an interesting spherical bearing/polyurethane hybrid called a Currie "Jimmy Joint" (don't accept cheap off-shore knockoffs). They are popular in the 4X4 community and are a neat way to get a PU bushed joint that has the motion freedom of a spherical joint. Put those into a Sphone type arm and you might get almost OEM level ride quality but with improved performance. Also, they are rebuildable! Cheers, James |
|
|
1972 Thunderbird
429 A/C only with manual windows and doors, no vinyl top! |
|
![]() |
|
Big Bird
Senior Member
Joined: 25-August-2013 Location: New York Status: Offline Points: 4195 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-August-2021 at 2:12AM |
|
Early cars do have some oddball bushing sets. I probably should have been clearer. Entire assemblies swap, but 72-73 have a variety of one-year type bits.
The complete rear links/arms all swap, but individual bushings may be different. Same for front control arms, or brakes. On a fun note Dennis Gage just had a 72 Bird on My Classic Car. Brown with a white top, 460 and Leather (Pleather?) interior.
|
|
|
"What we do in full frontal view, is more honest than your cleaned-up mind."
Randy 1979 T-Bird 2005 F-150 STX RCSB 4.6, 3.55 LSD How the Heck does a REGULAR CAB SHORTBED weigh over 5200 pounds? |
|
![]() |
|
1972Bird
New Member
Joined: 04-August-2021 Location: Blaine, WA Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22-August-2021 at 11:29AM |
|
I'm not too surprised about the parts variability. Makes the hobby a bit more challenging.... Cool, I will check out the DG thing. I found the factory service books refer to my interior as "Natural Grain Leather/Mataeo Vinyl". I presume that just means it's a better grade of vinyl (?), but not as good as the "Natural Grain Leather/Corinth. Vinyl" available in the Lincoln MK4. Corinthian vinyl! Wow!! I thought Ricardo Montalban and Chrysler had some kind of lock on that stuff. Very impressive haha. Actually according to the Web, it looks like Lincoln pre-empted Chrysler's ad company by at least two years since Ricardo didn't start using that phrase until '74. I got the upper control arm out and removed the bushings. They are two different parts and again, both are NLA from the regular suppliers however I was able to source the "forward" ones from Rare Parts. They are about $25 so I ordered two. RP also lists a kit with one forward and one rearward but it is $125 and not in stock. Since they have the forward ones that must mean they want $100 each for the rearward whenever they get around to making more. I don't want to wait indefinitely, nor do I want to pay $100 a bushing, so I'm investigating other options to keep the project moving forward. Will update when I figure something out. Cheers, James
|
|
|
1972 Thunderbird
429 A/C only with manual windows and doors, no vinyl top! |
|
![]() |
|
1972Bird
New Member
Joined: 04-August-2021 Location: Blaine, WA Status: Offline Points: 14 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-September-2021 at 10:48AM |
|
Well I have completed my suspension rebuild project. All that is left to do is take the car in for an alignment. For those that have challenges finding the elusive Rear Upper Control Arm (rear) bushing that is not currently available anywhere, I was able to cut down the Mevotech MS404085 bushings that I had previously ordered for the LCAs and that turned out to be the wrong ones for my car. The Mevos have a "stepped" OD, whereas the factory correct parts do not. Fortunately the smaller OD is the correct size and the larger stepped portion is short enough that you can press the bushing into the arm and have it roughly centered. It's not exactly centered but I don't it will matter for functionality. The Mevos are also a bit too long to fit into the axle bracket. I tried two different methods to make them fit but I'm too embarrassed to explain how hockey the first one was, so for those that want to do it this is my suggestion: 1. Measure the axle bracket so you know how much to cut off the bush then rig up a way to safely hold it firmly while you cut it. 2. If you have a lathe and know how to use then great. I don't so I screwed a short piece of C-channel (2" x 1" I think) to a 10" x 3" x 1/2" thk length of plywood and bolted a hose clamp the the c-channel so I could tighten the bushing down. I clamped this contraption to my bandsaw (metal cutting blade) and cut the bushing down (un-flanged end) to a little longer than what I needed. I did that because I couldn't keep the bandsaw cutting accurately in a straight line. 3. I then moved the contraption over to a regular miter saw with a carbide tipped ripping blade. That's not the best choice for steel but it's what I had available. The miter saw worked OK and I was very careful to cut slowly. It makes quite a mess and the rubber ducts/fumes are not pleasant but the saw makes a very accurate straight cut and if you come close with the band saw, there is not much to take off. 4. Now you have to cut the outside shell about 1/2" shorter while not removing any rubber. I cut the head off a 2" long 14mm bolt, chucked it in my drill press and secured the bush tight with a 14mm nut, again on the un-flanged end. I bolted an old cross slide drill press vice to the drill press bed. I put an old lather cutting bit into the vice and set the bed height to where the tool would cut the bushing outer shell at the correct length. I ran the drill press medium fast and slowly fed the bit into the bushing shell by using the cross slide adjustment. Again, the idea is to cut the outer metal shell only with as little damage to the rubber as possible. This is a bit tricky but I was cautious and it seemed to work OK. You should be left with the outer shell being sepearted about 1/2" shorter than the inner sleeve. 5. To get the outer shell piece off I removed the cross slide setup, clamped the bushing onto the drill press bed, centered it to the chuck and then used a 1-7/8" hole saw to separate the metal shell from the rubber for that 1/2" long section. There will be a lot of smoke, flying molten rubber dust and of course a bad smell, but a good hole saw cuts pretty quick. I used an in and out motion with the hole saw to try to keep the heat down and stop it from getting "welded" to the rubber 6. The rubber portion of the OEM bush has a very rounded shape from outer shell to inner sleeve, which is different than every other bush that looks more cylindrical. I used a sanding disk on my angle grinder to quickly taper the rubber from outer shell to inner sleeve. I think the factory did that because of the angle the control arm might deflect and they didn't want the rubber to bind. It sounds like a lot of work but really the second one didn't take very long, maybe an 1.5 hours from start to finish and that's because I was trying some different ideas. If I did it again it would probably be half that time. If you absolutely need to replace that one bush and own a drill press, a band saw or even just a miter saw with a carbide blade, you can do it and I can tell you they installed OK and seem to be working fine. The modified bush is slightly beefier and therefore more firm than the original but if so then I expect that is a good thing. For me this suspension rebuild is now complete and after the alignment is done I will have spent my 2021 budget for the T-Bird. My next project is to get the exhaust worked on because the PO installed a red-neck dual exhaust with only two Cherry Bombs and I don't care for the sound. I'm hoping to find a shop that can install two Walker Turbo mufflers at low cost but I suspect that job will likely have to wait until next year's budget allocation. I hope my humble write-up helps somebody in the same situation and I will remain lurking in the back-ground learning from the rest of you. Cheers, James |
|
|
1972 Thunderbird
429 A/C only with manual windows and doors, no vinyl top! |
|
![]() |
|
handsofstone
Senior Member
Joined: 13-April-2018 Location: Northeast Status: Offline Points: 4229 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-September-2021 at 4:25PM |
|
Well done. Ingenuity at it's finest.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |