![]() |
'76 460 rebuild suggestions |
Post Reply
|
| Author | |
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: '76 460 rebuild suggestionsPosted: 23-May-2024 at 4:52AM |
|
Hey guys, looking for recommendations. I want to pull the hot rod engine out of the Tomato and do a performance rebuild on the original 460 that came in my Torino so it maintains the "numbers matching" aspect of my build. Not going too radical on the build, so I think a factory short block rebuild should suffice, but I have some other factory bits I'd like to use on the top end...
Have a pair of C8VE heads that I'd like to massage a little to make them breath a bit easier and I also have a D0OE '70/'71 CJ intake manifold (cast iron!) that will necessitate the use of a spreadbore carb. Trying to keep it an economical build using mostly FOMOCO (and stock appearing) parts if possible but looking for input from those who may have already been down this road. ALL SUGGESTIONS APPRECIATED
![]() Edited by TV 2M8O - 23-May-2024 at 11:38PM |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Online Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-May-2024 at 10:56PM |
|
Hey Joe,
Sounds like you are pointing the rebuild in a good direction, stock shortblock will handle a good bit of power and will be reliable. I have been dealing with 460's since the mid 80's and have rebuilt a few, mostly just warmed up stock style examples. I'd say the biggest hurdles are finding a competent machine shop and cam/lifter issues if using hydraulic flat tappet camshaft, as of right now I am on my THIRD rebuild of my late son's 472 due to cam/lifter failures, been dealing with this since December. What kind of compression are you wanting to end up with? C8VE/DOVE-C heads are basically the same, hope yours are not drilled for the EGR ports(most are not), allows for smoother exhaust port finish. Piston choices are somewhat limited unless high dollar stuff is wanted, must pay attention to compression height as well as block's deck height to keep compression within reason but also keep quench below .050", a typical rebuild using stock style 70's pistons can yield quench distances of .070"+, not good for detonation resistance or power. When I had my block machined I went with 10.295" deck height and using '88-'92 460 EFI 3109H pistons left the pistons .005" "in the hole" and used Fel-Pro 1018 head gasket with .041" compressed thickness, gives 9.73 CR using ported D3VE-A2A heads and will allow further decking in the future and quench is right at .046". The EFI pistons have a much shallower dish(7cc) and higher compression height (1.76") as compared to earlier rebuilder type pistons 22-24cc dish and 1.752" compression height), they also use the standard 5/64-5/64-3/16 ring pack. The 93-97 460 pistons have a higher compression height of 1.772" with a larger 15cc dish, but a thinner ring pack-read more expensive. using a standard volume/pressure Melling oil pump is plenty for stock spec'd main and con rod clearances, HV oil pumps are said to cost HP but also aerates the oil due to bypass conditions. Using an early 68-72 double roller timing set(you may have to omit the crankshaft slinger using these due to clearance issues) will allow easier camshaft degreeing-YES degree the camshaft!! Durabond cam bearings and KING rod and main bearings are good choices. Choosing a camshaft is a balancing act, 460's usually like .015" and 15 degrees more lift and duration on the exhaust side, so a dual pattern is usually a must to get the most potential out of the engine. Intake-for torque the stock cast iron intake is king, but weight and less HP is the penalty. It has been said the Edelbrock Performer is a good intake for a warmed over 460 and makes more HP than the iron stocker and is quite a weight savings. Intake gaskets-unless you drive in the winter, use one that blocks the heat crossover in the heads or a "bathtub" gasket for an LPG application to keep engine heat/oil splash off bottom of intake-Fel-Pro MS96044 is a good example, it also helps with vapor lock issues. Exhaust-Hooker 6126's, I haven't had any issues with mine and they have been installed since '92, if porting the heads use them, if leaving the heads alone just use manifolds. I run headers on every 460 engine I've rebuilt, they provide more power, usually more mileage and are lighter than the manifolds(hell, I'd run headers on my lawnmower if they made them). Timing cover-try to re-use stock factory unit, the aftermarket ones do not fit as well, at least the ones I have tried. These are just a few things off the top of my head. Try visiting www.460ford.com for more answers, great folks there with lots of helpful info. Good luck.
|
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-May-2024 at 6:54AM |
|
my understanding there are 3 different sized ports, pretty sure your C8VE heads and the CJ intake will be a mismatch. there's a chart at the bottom of this article showing the various port dimensions. exhaust ports are similarly different and should be considered to match your intended manifolds the std size port and the police are very close in size and may not make
a unicorn fart's worth of difference but the CJ port is quite a bit larger and could cause fuel puddling at the gasket if not sealing
issues? may or may not be an issue if it doesn't match the heads, does
your CJ intake have the Rochester Quadra-Jet or the 4300-D spreadbore
carb flange? they're different and carbs are not cross-compatible. Rochester carbs with the Ford transmission kickdown linkage are also a
little hard to find as aquartlow points out, unknowledgeable parts selection can result in excessive static compression ratio or a gutless wonder. combustion chamber volume, piston dish volume, compression height as well as the cam need to be selected carefully for a happy ending
|
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-January-2026 at 8:27AM |
|
Todd & Max, my C8VE heads DO NOT have the EGR ports drilled so that's an obstacle I don't have to worry with. Right now I'm leaning towards installing the larger 460PI valves and increasing the intake and exhaust ports to match the PI heads as well. Thoughts are to build a '71 style 460PI style engine for a bit more power than the '76 460 had. In my original LE back in the day, I installed a '71 429 4B engine and boy did that engine wake the ole girl up!!
Still researching the short block internals and looking at the spread bore carb for the '71 CJ intake... HOLY MOLEY, how is the Ford Rochester carb different from the GM Rochester? The GM carbs are affordable while the Ford carb is astronomical?? Thanks for you advise....
Edited by TV 2M8O - 15-January-2026 at 6:10AM |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-January-2026 at 12:17PM |
|
are you sure the manifold accepts a Quadrajet or is it the Ford 4300-D spreadbore? i'm not sure if the secondaries are the same size / location but the primaries are different in both size and location. Rochester made 573 billion GM Quadrajets and maybe like 14 for Ford? was the Ford Quadrajet only a 1 year run? the linkage flange is different and i'd imagine all of the internal metering as well as spec'd by Ford but yeah the Ford 'bog is a rare bird
|
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-January-2026 at 6:48AM |
|
Max, here's my '71 429 CJ intake....
![]() as you can see it's definitely the Quadrajet mounting. Guess I'll pick up the Rochester QJ to Holley spread bore adapter. Kinda liked the idea of cruising on the smaller bores then really dumping the fuel into the engine when I needed her to gitty up and go!! Oh well..... I see the 429/460PI intakes have the funky Holley style spread bore carb mounting so I'd hate to think how hard that carb might be to find!
Edited by TV 2M8O - 16-January-2026 at 2:25AM |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
72FordGTS
Admin Group
GTS.org Admin Joined: 06-September-2005 Location: Ontario, Canada Status: Offline Points: 6780 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-January-2026 at 2:58AM |
|
What about using a Holley Q-Jet replacement carb?
I don't know much about these, but Rock might know more? They are discontinued, but maybe you will have more luck finding one compared to a Ford Q-Jet. And I am sure they would be cheaper.
|
|
|
Vince
1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car GTS.org Admin |
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Online Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-January-2026 at 2:18PM |
|
I'd install an Edelbrock Performer 460 and paint it if wanted to be inconspicuous, then install a Holley 3310 VS variant to keep C6 kickdown and have an electric choke. You'd be money and HP/TQ ahead as compared to a Ford 4300/4350 or a Rochester model....just sayin'
|
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-January-2026 at 6:05PM |
|
not a lot. not surprised they're discontinued as Holley is for the most part out of the carburetor business. i've been thinking about Q-Jets lately, i've never known them to be anything but a darn dependable good running street performance tool. and the sound they make when you flip the lid! this page i use https://www.mortec.com/carbs.htm for basic Holley reference shows 3 model 4165's, List #'s 6262, 6710 and 9023 if i didn't miss any. not a complete list
List .. cfm ...... jets ...... pv's 6262 800 (F)62,(R)85 8.5,6.5 6710 800 (F)63,(R)86 6.5,3.5 9023 800 (F)61,(R)86 8.5,6.5 (marine) i also just ran across a Model 4175, List 80555C 650 cfm. not sure if there are more 4175's or what the difference is? OK yeah there are, more than a couple. 9923, 8679, R9895, R8546 on ebay so anyway that's where i was going with all this, you never know what'll pop up NIB on ebay from time to time |
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-January-2026 at 11:35PM |
|
Hey guys,
THANKS for all your input!! Still digging/researching parts/info/ideas as well as a local machine shop to handle all the machining and that sort of stuff.... AND FAMILIAR WITH FOMOCO ENGINES. Couple places Ford guys in the area have recommended so just trying to nail down what I want to do. I have the original 1976 Ford 460 that came in my car (like to keep it numbers matching) that I want to up the power to about 400 horsepower. I had one of the factory Starsky & Hutch Torinos new back in 1976 and it came with the 351 Windsor. Needless to say that engine in that heavy car left a lot to be desired in the performance department. A buddy had a ’71 Ford Galaxie that had a 429 4V and C6 that he was going to junk (had been in an accident) so I bought the engine/transmission and put it in my Torino. WOW, night and day difference... 351W = 145hp vs 429-4V = 360hp! So my aim is to use ALL FACTORY COMPONENTS (as many as possible anyways) so when the hood is popped and the air cleaner removed, the engine looks as it would straight from the factory back in the 70's. We didn't have all the various go fast goodies for the 385 series back in the day so it was factory hp bits or nothing. Looking to go a bit above stock 460 but not quite Cobra Jet radical so targeting the Police Interceptor specs.... valve and port sizes. Want to stay with the stock style stamped steel rockers with positive stop screw in studs, non-adjustible with guide plates and hardened pushrods. Cam wise thinking I want something with a little lope but again nothing radical but easily run on pump gas. Speaking of gas, from my research I've READ that simply adding the Cobra Jet intake (and boy is that mutha HEAVY!!) to an otherwise stock 429/460 will yield a 30-65hp gain (various older sources) WITHOUT matching the port sizes. I would also like the keep the spread bore QJ simply because of the smaller primaries and huge secondaries but we'll see how that plays out. This is a fact finding mission so I appreciate every one's suggestions, experiences and ideas... KEEP EM COMIN'
![]() |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
72FordGTS
Admin Group
GTS.org Admin Joined: 06-September-2005 Location: Ontario, Canada Status: Offline Points: 6780 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-January-2026 at 1:32AM |
|
I agree with Rock, Q-Jets are great running carbs. I worked at a GM shop when I was young and also have owned numerous cars with Q-Jets. So I know them well and have rebuilt many. They were IMO one of the best all around daily driver carbs. Also, Joe, Maybe the Holley spreadbore isn't an option for you because it didn't come from the factory on a Ford, but it does have the small primaries and large secondaries like a Q-Jet. FWIW, my dad's old '79 F-150 had a factory Holley (not sure which model, but I am pretty sure it was not a spreadbore) on it's 460. Here is a pic of the Holley: ![]() |
|
|
Vince
1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car GTS.org Admin |
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-January-2026 at 5:05AM |
|
Morning guys. Yesterday I rolled my original 460 out of the corner and pulled it's old carb and spacer out of the stash to see what was on the engine when I got it. Research showed that from the factory, the Torino 460 came equipped with a Motorcraft 4350 spread bore style carburetor. Lookin at the intake manifold on my original engine shows it is indeed set up as a spread bore (FOMOCO pattern?)....
![]() Here are the components on my Torino when she arrived.... ![]() The original EGR spacer also has the spread bore venturi arrangement..... ![]() But then an open throat spacer/adapter was installed.... ![]() followed by a Holley List-8207, 4160 series, 600 cfm carb. ![]() ![]() Well I also discovered the Motorcraft 4350 was a 550-600 cfm carb while the earlier Motorcraft 4300 was a 715 cfm carb. So now I'll dig into the Motorcraft versus Rochester carbs and try to narrow down my search. Again, my thanks for your input! |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-January-2026 at 5:42AM |
|
Hi Joe, how much hood clearance does your car have with the 460? The factory intakes and any aftermarket versions of them are not as good as any new design for airflow or distribution. If there isn't enough room for any more height of the intake/carb/spacer/air cleaner, then you are generally stuck with the original intake height. But if you could replace the intake with something else, that would open up your car choices, the size and the bore pattern. The normal Holley pattern has countless choices you know, so consider the stock intake as a poor baseline choice.
The 460 flows a lot more air than a typical OEM dual plane was intended for. They were made for stock low rpm street transportation, hardly ever seeing 4k rpm or more. The 351C 4V heads were made for high rpm, and the OEM intakes were not, they too run out of breath somewhere above 4k-5k. If you hardly ever push the rpm's to get it up there, then any good dual plane will do, obviously a newer AL version too.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-January-2026 at 7:57AM |
|
Don, I have a '71 429CJ intake that I'll be dropping into place on my original 460 once it has been gone thru and rebuilt with massaged '68 429/460 heads. I know there are more modern and performance oriented pieces available today but I'm doing a "day 1" rebuild of what was available in '76.
|
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-January-2026 at 8:02AM |
yes the Rochester / Carter spreadbore pattern is different from the Ford pattern, which i believe (haven't checked yet) is a hybrid of the Holley 4150/4160 primaries and the 4500 Dominator secondaries. the Rochester / Carter primaries are located more outboard than the Ford pattern. just to be clear there is a Ford 4300 carb which is a squarebore flange, the 4300-D and 4350 that i forgot about are speadbore. the open gasket on top was necessary to allow the squarebore secondaries to open ;) Edited by Rockatansky - 18-January-2026 at 8:09AM |
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-February-2026 at 8:03AM |
|
WOO HOO.... I just scored a FOMOCO rebuilt (NORS) Rochester '70 429CJ carb #7040288, AUTO/NON AC on Marketplace for an outstanding price!
![]() Now I need to determine what I'll need to change to use it on an AC equipped 385...
|
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
72FordGTS
Admin Group
GTS.org Admin Joined: 06-September-2005 Location: Ontario, Canada Status: Offline Points: 6780 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-February-2026 at 12:19PM |
|
Nice score Joe! What kind of shape is it in? I am assuming rebuilt it must be decent? Hopefully whoever did the rebuild used decent quality parts as many of the parts store kits are garbage these days. There are a few Q-jet specialists out there than can get you good quality parts.
|
|
|
Vince
1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car GTS.org Admin |
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-February-2026 at 3:40AM |
|
Well, here is a pic of the Quadrajet I scored on Marketplace....
![]() As you can see by the decal on the fuel filter it is a Ford Reman unit that has been in storage for decades!! This carb is set up for a non-AC, Automatic CobraJet so I will need to source the necessary parts to be able to use it for an AT/AC car. Speaking of decades in storage and sourcing parts, I opened up the bits that were included with my C8VE heads hoping to find the fulcrums, rockers, studs and hardware for the OEM valvetrain only to find just the screw in studs. I was hoping to do a "day 1" head swap by using the early style C8VE components atop the rebuilt 460 short block, so if anyone has a complete set of ball fulcrums, rockers and lock nuts they could part with PLEASE let me know! ![]() Thanks guys
![]() |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
72FordGTS
Admin Group
GTS.org Admin Joined: 06-September-2005 Location: Ontario, Canada Status: Offline Points: 6780 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-February-2026 at 11:59AM |
|
The carb looks great! For the AT, really the only difference would be a provision for the kick down rod. Try to find a pic on an AT carb to see the differences in the linkage. It might be worthwhile to pull the off the carb to check what primary rods and jets you have, and to double check the float level. The secondary rods can be removed without taking the top off. Or you can just take a chance and try to run it as is and tune from there. Another note, you will need different sized hold down bolts front and rear. You can buy aftermarket Q-Jet bolts that are similar to factory. |
|
|
Vince
1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car GTS.org Admin |
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-February-2026 at 9:31PM |
|
Finished removing a snapped off drive screw that secures the baffle to the underside of the Cobra Jet intake manifold (oops, didn't take an after pic!) ....
![]() With the drive screw drilled out, I flipped the manifold over and set the QuadraJet into place to see how things lined up and what bits and pieces I still need to source to mate the carb to my engine. The QJ I scored was for an automatic, non-ac car but mine will have air so I need to find the correct bracket and throttle position solenoid to install on the carb. ![]() ![]() ![]() The QJ also uses a divorced choke assembly on the 429CJ's.... ![]() so I'll also need to find the choke stove tube assembly, the pull down divorced choke assembly and the stove cover gasket. I looked on line prior to going over to play and found no one offers the correct profile gasket at a reasonable price ($18-$32 for this little piece )....![]() so I just made a template and will make my own. ![]() My google search also turned up NO NOS choke tube nor divorced choke assemblies so I guess I'll also be making/adapting something to fill these voids. I'll be posting a second thread under PARTS WANTED with a couple sketches the parts in question. Appreciate any and all leads to the needed ball fulcrum rocket arm parts as well as the Ford Rochester QuadraJet bits!! Also a recommendation and an informative QuadraJet manual?? ![]() Thanks guys ![]() |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-February-2026 at 8:16AM |
|
After an extensive Google search, I've decided to go with the Rochester electric choke as it's readily available where as the divorced choke components are as elusive as hens teeth as are the throttle stop solenoid, bracket and hardware.
Here's a link to my PARTS WANTED topic on the solenoid.... ANY LEADS APPRECIATED!!
![]() |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-March-2026 at 10:31PM |
|
OK, I need to make a decision on the heads for my "460CJ" engine build.
![]() From all my research into the 385 series engines it sounds like the weak link of the engine is the exhaust port. The intake to exhaust ratio sounds to be more inlet biased so I'm thinking when I have the C8VE heads worked over, I'll keep the stock 2.18" x 1.87" intake port, increase the valve to a 2.19" dia PI valve size and just smooth out the intake passage to reduce turbulance. On the exhaust side, increase the valve to the PI 1.73" dia, increase the exhaust port to the CJ size of 2.25" x 1.30" and blend the new port size back into the head knocking down the EGR bump and also smoothing them out to get the gasses out ASAP. I'll also need to decide on the valve train so the correct springs can be installed during the head prep... All that in addition to hot tanking, magnafluxing, installing hardened valve seat and bronze guides (if necessary). ![]() As always appreciate your thoughts and suggestions!
![]() |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Online Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 11-March-2026 at 11:02PM |
|
Joe, if porting your C8ve heads, go here Rein"Car"nation High Performance and Automotive Repair / services(Scotty is a good dude)
for porting instructions, sometimes just die grinding the exhaust port can hurt rather than help depending on where you focus your efforts. Get rid of the rail rockers, usually requires guide plates, hardened pushrods and depending on machine work(decking the block/heads), solid or hydraulic flat tappet or solid/hydraulic roller setups, the pushrods may/will need to be a different length. FWIW, I went through 3 fully engines with around 1.5 hours run time on all of them due to hydraulic flat tappet lifter failures(yes I used dedicated break-in oil and Gibbs assembly grease, primed the oil system and etc on all of them), after $$$$ money lost, I went with a Howards hydraulic roller cam and Morel lifters. Vid of final engine, it's in my late son's '95 F150 4x4:
|
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-March-2026 at 3:13AM |
|
A buddy at work just asked me a question I couldn't answer.... what kind of power would the '76 engine make swapping to the C8VE heads with the CJ intake & carb?? I know the '68 head has a 75CC chamber and the '76 has a 95CC chamber but not sure how the '68 heads would work on the '76 short block power wise.
Anyone have an answer??
![]() |
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-March-2026 at 5:30AM |
|
I don't have an answer, but an accompanying question: are the pistons the same between 1968 and 1976, or is there a difference, like maybe a switch from flat-top to dished pistons? That's the only way I can see anything in the short block affecting power (unless the early ones have a forged crank or something).
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Online Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-March-2026 at 8:00AM |
Short answer is around 8.95 - 1 CR..... but horrible quench distance of .077" which would be highly susceptible to detonation unless using 93 octane at all times.
|
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
TV 2M8O
Senior Member
Joined: 20-September-2006 Location: Southern Ohio Status: Offline Points: 2153 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-March-2026 at 9:02AM |
|
Todd, yeah I knew the '76 460 pistons had the Grand Canyon in their top sides!
I guess now I'm thinking about how to make some real power (+-400HP) with the original engine and not drop a boat load of moolah in the process... Father time is catching up with me!!!
|
|
![]() TV 2M8O OUT JOE 1976 Gran Torino S&H season 2-4 Clone Project Blog: http://tv2m8o.blogspot.com/ |
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |