Print Page | Close Window

youtuber Pole Barn Gargage 73 Torino vid

Printed From: The Ford Torino Page
Category: General Discussion
Forum Name: Video Gallery
Forum Description: Members videos and other videos of interest
URL: https://forum.grantorinosport.org/forum_posts.asp?TID=20702
Printed Date: 26-September-2023 at 11:06AM
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.06 - https://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: youtuber Pole Barn Gargage 73 Torino vid
Posted By: Rockatansky
Subject: youtuber Pole Barn Gargage 73 Torino vid
Date Posted: 24-April-2023 at 2:45PM
just popped up on my feed, watching it now don't blame me!




-------------
72 GT Ute
   



Replies:
Posted By: handsofstone
Date Posted: 26-April-2023 at 5:03AM
I would never have a scoop on a 73. The front looks sweet without adding one of any type whether grafting a 72 or a Torino like he has. But to each their own 


Posted By: Rockatansky
Date Posted: 16-June-2023 at 11:05AM
follow up vid






-------------
72 GT Ute
   


Posted By: Eliteman76
Date Posted: 17-June-2023 at 10:58AM
Guy  is nice and down to earth...but a few things, like the air shocks...needs to learn not to tie the lines to a single tee fitting. Jim Williams wrecked his S&H car that way. 

-------------
Andrew:GTS.ORG admin, '72 Q code 5 speed Restomod
Pondering: #99Problems


Posted By: Inkara1
Date Posted: 17-June-2023 at 11:24AM
I'm curious about his 450 CFM carb for his 400 V8. I have a 600 CFM on my 351C with 2V heads. I guess if you're not going past 4,000 RPM, it would flow enough.

-------------
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.


Posted By: Eliteman76
Date Posted: 17-June-2023 at 11:41AM
Way undersized IMO. Factory 400 carbs were typically 500CFM? 

I know there were factory carbs for 400 V8's that were actually a tick bigger. 

I ran an Edelbrock 1405 A 600CFM performer carb on my '79 F150 4x4 for years and I hated the start up over the factory carb, but driving, it was miles better with the 4 barrel carb. I also had swapped to a used Torker intake so on the stock 400, it was OK for how the truck was.    


-------------
Andrew:GTS.ORG admin, '72 Q code 5 speed Restomod
Pondering: #99Problems


Posted By: 72FordGTS
Date Posted: 20-June-2023 at 2:25PM
I had some time to watch the videos, not too bad.  It's nice to see an old Torino get some positive coverage.  He clearly loves the car.  I personally don't mind a scoop on a '73.  I actually think the Boss 429 style scoop looks better on a '73 than a '72 style scoop.  It seems to match the blunt front end better.

I am curious on the 450 carb too?  That would offer nothing over the stock 2100.  That Holley 2-bbl that was on there was defintely smaller than the original 2100.  When my '72 400 was stock I did a 4bbl swap like him, but used a Holley 670.  It really woke up the engine on the high end, pulled very nicely for a stock low compression engine.

I agree on the air shocks.  He also needs to get some stiffer springs or sway bars on that beast.


-------------
Vince

1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car

GTS.org Admin



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06 - https://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net