![]() |
Rear suspension |
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
| Author | |
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-June-2025 at 3:39PM |
|
I replaced the passenger side axle bearing because the old one had started leaking its grease out and was feeling smooth but a bit tight compared to driver side bearing, which turns nicely in my hand and is not leaking. I replaced the driver side axle seal last year after I found it was leaking. That's when I found out someone had swapped in a later rear end, so I have the "Torino style big bearing" axle. I'm trying to remember if I also replaced the seal on the passenger side, but I don't remember ever seeing leakage on that side.
I wonder about the backlash given that it's been the same noise with two different gear sets, one of which had never been installed in a car after rebuild until it went into mine. I guess it's possible for two to have an identical issue, but I'd tend to think it's something separate causing the issue that would make it do it with *any* rear end.
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-June-2025 at 9:02PM |
|
So I adjusted the arms tonight, finding that one full turn changes the pinion angle by two degrees. So I have it sticking up by two more degrees than before. I figured I'd try that based on a Hot Rod article I found that said to adjust the pinion upward to correct deceleration vibrations. It's a little quieter on downhill, but still makes the same noise decelerating from 70 to 62 or so on flat ground. Maybe a *hair* quieter but still pretty prominent. I'm hesitant to adjust the pinion upward much more.
I grabbed the pinion yoke and couldn't get it to move sideways or up-down, but forgot to try pulling outward on it. The hunt continues, I guess...
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
72FordGTS
Admin Group
GTS.org Admin Joined: 06-September-2005 Location: Ontario, Canada Status: Offline Points: 6780 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-June-2025 at 1:47AM |
|
Are your pinion bearings ok? Even if they don't have noticeable play, maybe they are the source of the noise if they are worn. Did the Spohn arms affect the ride quality? It is interesting that they are quieter.
|
|
|
Vince
1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car GTS.org Admin |
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Offline Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-June-2025 at 3:09AM |
|
If it were mine and the noise was this concerning, I'd say it's either time to pull rear gear and have a driveline specialist look it over as well as the wheel/axle bearings and driveshaft's u-joints, or as another option is taking the vehicle to a driveline specialist and have them put the vehicle on a lift and have them spin the driveline to see if they could detect any issues. If a "driveline specialist" can't be found, 4x4 shops deal with driveline vibration issues all the time, they should be able to help diagnose this root of all this.
|
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-June-2025 at 3:14AM |
That is good news. I don't know how bad the issue is, it's hard to describe in print to another person. I hope it is minor, that it is lessened is good news. The 9" has three pinion bearings so unless it had been run dry at some point, I'd guess without play showing it might be okay. What did the gear oil look like when the chunk was removed originally? That's big question because so much depends on prior owner's maintenance care. If unknown, sometimes you need to guess the worst and do something extra.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-June-2025 at 9:20PM |
|
I'd say the ride quality is probably around the same with the Spohn arms as the stock arms with poly bushings. If it's better, it's not night-and-day. I still have the same springs (for a 1975 wagon) and same shocks (KYB Gas-A-Just) as before.
The oil was pretty black and smelled like gear oil does, but I didn't see much if any metal in it. But the new pumpkin was one complete unit, the whole third member, ready to unbolt the old one, remove it, place the new one in and bolt it in place. The new one was sold as a fresh rebuild, so it should have new bearings. Since it had been sitting 20+ years in a pillow case in my dad's garage, I put some light oil on the bearings before turning the yoke by hand to verify that it took 3.5 turns of the yoke to get one turn of the ring gear. All that to say that any neglect by the prior owner shouldn't come into play here. Now I did end up having to take the yoke off my old one and put it on the new one, and I used my electric impact on it as I've seen car youtubers do with no issues. I do think I'll check to make sure I made it to 150 ft-lb to see if the gear whine goes away (separate noise from the rumble). This whine is most audible in the 50-60 mph range regardless of throttle position. As for the rumble, on the old third member, when I replaced the seal, I also replaced the crush washer (and the old crush washer was split), and torqued that one by hand instead of with a power tool, so it wouldn't have been caused by a too loose pinion nut then (and the noise was the same with the split crush washer and the new crush washer). One thing I was just thinking... is there a specification somewhere for the stock spring ride heights for the 1972 wagon springs vs. the 1975 wagon springs? I put new springs at all four corners when I replaced all the bushings. Mevotech doesn't seem to show that info that I can find for the SMS-803V springs. The car is a little higher up with the new springs than the old ones, but I assumed the old ones were worn, being 50 years old with 96,000 or so miles on the body. It sits level, just a little higher than before. I figured the 1975 springs might have a higher rate to deal with the extra weight of the heavier bumpers, but I thought ride height would be the same. I don't know how much higher other than "a little" because I didn't know ahead of time that I'd need to measure. I do still have the old springs, though they've been sitting outside. I'm in the desert, so not much rain. Could my best bet be to swap back to the old springs? Like where someone puts a lift kit on their truck and creates driveline angle issues? My "lift" has to be less than an inch, though.
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-June-2025 at 2:36AM |
This might be the cause of the noise, the pinion nut being off to change the flange. The ring and pinion gears are set up originally to obtain a proper pinion bearing preload. That means the nut is installed to crush the crush washer a certain magical amount, which achieves the proper bearing preload. Without crushing the washer, such as a new one put in, the bearings will be too loose. If the nut is tightened too much(crush washer crushed too far), then the bearings will be too tight. So is that a rebuilt diff, with the same crush washer it was rebuilt with? The change of the pinion flange is okay to do, but the nut needs to go on tight enough to hold the bearing preload it had, but not so much that it crushes the crush washer further. That is measured during the preload step by a 1/4" torque wrench, with no axles, the differential turning freely. That's the process I have never done myself, and hope to learn soon. That torque spec is about 10in/lbs for Ford diffs. If the nut is removed, it's very hard to know how much to reinstall the nut. Doing the seal is common to do by marking the nut and pinion shaft end, and that is a guess, a hope that it works okay.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
pyntre
Senior Member
Joined: 29-March-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-June-2025 at 3:21AM |
|
I think at this point with all the “guess”
work that’s been done with preloads and different procedures it’s time to pull the center section and have a true 9” specialist go through it and set it all up correctly! I mean how many times do you want to lay under the car “ hoping “ this or that will solve a problem? I will go to great lengths to do 99% of my own work but sometimes you need a pro , with pro tools , and pro knowledge. At that point , put two new bearings on the axles , new seals , etc .. You may be able to save most the parts in the center section , but if you drive it a bunch with out of tolerance parts you’ll end up with an 80 pound boat anchor . |
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-June-2025 at 5:39AM |
|
I had to replace the rearend of my 98 Explorer this past April. In January I inspected the gears in the 8.8 rear by removing the cover. seeing nothing obvious, I put the cover back on plus new gear oil. The whine I was hunting got worse, I found the pinion flange loose(side to side) a couple of weeks later. I kept driving it for work since I didn't have the skill to rebuild the diff(set the pinion bearing preload). I did have a spare 98 Mountaineer, so I finally swapped the two rears in April. I was lucky to keep going until then, the ring gear had lost a bunch of teeth. The picture below was taken the day after I last drove it home from work. The rear is toast of course, I knew it would eat all of the gears if I kept driving it. The cause of this was likely being low on fluid, it was low when I bought the truck, and it had a slow leak that wasn't fixed when I first dropped the pan to change the gear oil. There was some kind of damage in the OEM cover that wasn't filled with the RTV I use. If you think the rear differential is not right, make a decision quickly about fixing it. The 9" is great for being a replaceable chunk assembly, that can be removed and taken easily to an expert for service. ![]() |
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-June-2025 at 8:05PM |
|
So I checked and was at or above 150 ft-lb on the pinion nut. I broke the nut loose and re-tightened to 150 ft-lb (the limit of the smaller of my two 1/2-inch torque wrenches) to see if it would make a difference in the whine. It took me some effort to get to 150 ft-lb. Then while I was under there, I adjusted the arms another 1/2 turn (one degree of pinion adjustment). I can still hear the rumble some in certain situations, but it does seem a little quieter. It's definitely not worse. It was hard to get a good feel for it, though, since it's yet another extremely windy night, meaning wind noise in the car. Not much difference on the gear whine.
Side note: anyone else with Spohn arms live in constantly windy areas? How has crosswind stability been for you? I do think mine is more sensitive to crosswinds now.
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
pyntre
Senior Member
Joined: 29-March-2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 275 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-June-2025 at 3:25AM |
|
You have to understand that the crush sleeve on a ford 9” pinion is a single use , 1 time deal . It doesn’t “ spring back “ so you can readjust it . It’s a CRUSH sleeve . So loosening the pinion nut up does nothing . Using an impact on it was the first mistake , that’s for truck lug nuts , not bearing clearance type stuff .
You need to take the center section out and have it serviced on a bench by a pro . Cross wind ??? That’s probably not covered in this forum
|
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-June-2025 at 3:56AM |
|
Inkara1 first mentioned the 9" was rebuilt, and he changed the pinion flange. I asked if he tightened the nut a lot installing it back, and he didn't say how he did that. So it's possible he hasn't altered the bearing crush, I also bet that he did but I don't know. It often can take way over 200lbsft to crush the sleeve to the needed thickness, so 150lbft may not have automatically applied more bearing pressure. We're guessing, we understand how the bearing preload is set, but it's not easy to explain, or to do it. Without knowing, my plan would be to remove the wheels and axles, and unbolt the driveshaft. Then rotate the pinion and see how it feels, how easily it rotates, and with how much play, how much resistance to rotation. If it's over tightened, the bearing preload, it might feel too "tight" that's my only idea short of removing the 9" chunk to fully look it over.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-June-2025 at 5:12AM |
|
When I changed the seal and crush washer in the old rear end, I'd estimate it took at least 300 ft-lb and possibly 400. My larger 250 ft-lb torque wrench didn't get it done. I had to use my 18-inch breaker bar with an extender to go past the body of the car, where I was putting my 300-plus-pound body weight on it. I'd do that a bit, then take off the breaker bar and put on the beam-type torque wrench with 1/4-3/8, 3/8-1/2, and 1/2-3/4 adapters (my only 1 1/16 socket is 3/4 drive) to turn the pinion and read the torque reading after initial movement but before I would run into the floor of the car after about 3/5 of a turn. Then put on the heavy stuff again to tighten it more, and repeat until I got a reading. It was a huge pain. That was the time when I accidentally tightened it too much and had a 50 in-lb reading. I backed it off a microscopic amount and had a reading of around 15 in-lb tu keep it turning, so I left it there and didn't have gear whine. The rumble noise at high speeds was there before and after that.
I kind of didn't feel like pulling the axles last night in the wind. Maybe if I get a calmer night soon, I can do it then. When I switched the yokes on the current setup, I just zipped it on with the electric impact (same one I use for lug nuts, so not the little one I'd use for deck screws) and let it rat-a-tat-tat for probably a couple seconds. It spun fine by hand after, so I figured I didn't overtighten it.
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Offline Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-June-2025 at 6:16AM |
|
Once you get inside the diff, do yourself a favor and install or have the tech install, a Ford 9" crush sleeve eliminator kit. It is basically a solid spacer with numerous shims that take the place of the crush sleeve and allows future pinion seal replacement(s), if necessary, without altering pinion bearing preload or backlash.
|
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-June-2025 at 10:29AM |
|
That's the ticket, it's the same initial process to get the preload, but without having to get another new crush washer from going too far. I'm planning to learn by doing a couple of front D35 diff's, for my Explorers. Those are very small and easy to toss around on a bench. I think the D35 is maybe an 8" ring gear, it's almost cute.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-June-2025 at 11:34PM |
|
Calmer night tonight wind-wise, so I figured I'd get under the car again. Finally decided to buy a digital angle finder that can read to .1 degrees, and found that I was getting bad readings with the cheap tool. I was getting about 3.9-4.1 on the tailshaft angle, and 2.8 or so on the pinion flange bolts. My yoke doesn't really have a flat part I can stick an angle finder to and get an accurate reading, so bolts it is. So I adjusted the arms another 3/4 turn to measure around 3.8-3.9 for the pinion angle. That's about as close to parallel as one could ask for. Driveshaft angle is about 4.5, so that should be a good setup for quietness but still circulating the grease in the U-joint caps.
Got out the 1/4-inch beam torque wrench and measured rotational torque at the pinion as little if any above zero. So I got out the bigger 1/2-inch torque wrench and tightened the pinion nut to 160 ft-lb, then checked rotational torque again with no change. Repeated with the big torque wrench set to 170, then 175, 180, 185 and 190, at which point I had 6-8 in-lb rotational torque. I believe that's at the low end of the spec for "used bearing," so I left it there. I could see gear oil in the driver's side axle tube (driveway isn't 100% level, it seems). Seal was doing a fine job of keeping it contained, but that tells me that I'm not low on oil. Test drive showed little to no improvement in gear whine or 70-60 deceleration rumble. Rumble is pretty quiet or gone at other speeds, but won't go away at deceleration between 70 and 60. I did check condition of the axle bearings again, and both felt great. *facepalm*
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-June-2025 at 7:53AM |
|
That's a good result for the moment for what seemed possible. Hopefully the clearance was just a little off, and now it may survive better and longer. Keep an ear alert to note any changes, and fingers crossed.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-June-2025 at 4:06PM |
when you're measuring pinion bearing preload, are you turning the ring gear also or strictly just the pinion?
|
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-June-2025 at 8:32PM |
|
Ring gear too. I wasn't about to drain the fluid and remove the pinion retainer at that point. I assume that turning the ring gear too (it's a limited-slip) is why it felt stair-steppy while turning it slowly. Quickly felt smoother. Is there an amount of rotational torque I should add to the expected number when also turning the ring gear?
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
Booyah45828
Member
Joined: 28-February-2022 Location: Ohio Status: Offline Points: 163 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-June-2025 at 2:46AM |
|
Of the couple dozen I've done they've all felt smooth, even with limited slips. Yes, they've all had an initial torque break to get the pinion moving, but once moving, it should be a smooth movement. But then again, I've never checked one with the axles installed.
That stair-steppy feeling might be your noise. Or it's because you're not turning it fast enough.
A tip on replacing pinion seals(or setting up pre-load period). The only torque wrench I use is a needle one for measuring preload, I don't use a torque wrench when tightening the nut. I don't really care what torque it is, so long as it holds my pre-load. I'll tighten the nut until I get the pre-load I want. When loosening it and not replacing the crush sleeve, one has to tighten it back exactly to where it was, or a hair tighter. The only way to do that is to mark the relationship between the pinion shaft, yoke and nut with a paint stick or chisel. When doing new bearings, It can take a trial or 2 before you get it right. I'll do it originally with the seal out, get the pre-load, mark the relationship, remove the nut and yoke, and then install the seal. |
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-June-2025 at 8:05AM |
|
Yeah, it would have a torque reading of 40+ in-lb to start moving. I was turning it slowly with the torque wrench because of the limited room to move it while installed in the car. I also turned the yoke by hand to see how it felt, so I was turning it much faster because I could do complete revolutions that way, and I didn't feel the stair-steppy feeling much if any then like I did with the torque wrench.
The axles were out, so it was just the pinion and ring gear (and spider gears, etc.).
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-June-2025 at 11:21AM |
|
if the ring gear is involved, then you're not reading pinion bearing preload. the carrier bearings should also have some preload on them adding to the total that you measured, i suspect the pinion bearings have insufficient preload on them. the pinion support can be removed from the 3rd member housing, chucked up in a vice and the pinion bearing preload measured accurately without the ring gear involved
Edited by Rockatansky - 19-June-2025 at 3:36PM |
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-June-2025 at 1:04AM |
|
Interesting stuff tonight. I found out I can remove the pinion support without having to even take off the tires, so nice timesaver there. So I got a rotational torque reading with just the pinion, around 10 in-lb. But the bearings felt very grainy, and I could see chunks of flat metal in them, like what you might see in an oil pan from failing main bearings. So I ordered a new bearing set, but I'm confused as to where the pieces might have come from. Meanwhile, I pulled out several larger chunks from the housing with a magnet. A couple were big enough to show a curve that looked like bits of ring gear teeth. But with the pinion out, I could check the ring gear, and all the teeth look fine. Pinion gear looks fine too. I wiped out the housing when I swapped third members, but I checked my old one anyway, and those teeth look fine too. Could it be something with the spider gears? Clutches?
There was also a copious amount of "forbidden glitter" in the gear oil I drained out. Now my question is if I go ahead and change the pinion bearings, or if I'd be better off putting my old 3.00:1 open diff back in. I'd need to switch the yoke back over, but this time since it's out of the car, it's easy enough to pull the pinion and set preload.
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-June-2025 at 1:21AM |
|
I didn't know that the whole pinion gear and bearings would come out separately, it's been ages since I dealt with a 9" in any way. That's good, but it'd be nice to know where the metal bits came from. If the bearings of the pinion were the first issue, then it might be solved by just replacing those. But who knows what else is hurt, debris can create damage to other bearings, and then the various gears. I think it'd be smart to pull the diff, and see how the rest of the gears and bearings seem. The parts are all very strong, but metal debris can hurt anything over time, the bearings would be the first to go I think. Also you need to remove as much of the bad gear oil as possible, and that means yanking the chunk to clean out the housing. Sorry to hear of that, I've had my fill of gear work for a while. My bad 8.8 rear had tons of big gear chunks in it, and fairly decent gear oil given the carnage. My good rear that I swapped in had immaculate gear oil in it, literally clear still, no bad smell, and it had close to 95k miles on the gear oil. I had swapped a Torsen diff into it at 99k miles, with Amsoil Severe Gear, no additive(no clutches), and serviced it once at about 150k miles, still looked like new. So the gear oil I drained out at 245k this March was good enough I could have reused. I love gear only diffs, the Detroit True Trac is the next best version.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
Booyah45828
Member
Joined: 28-February-2022 Location: Ohio Status: Offline Points: 163 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-June-2025 at 2:21AM |
|
The presence of metal in the oil always leads to a complete rebuild in my books. That metal is damaging and without total disassembly, you'll never get it all cleaned out.
|
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-June-2025 at 10:29AM |
i think what you're describing is called 'spalling' my guess from running them loose. i'll also guess that the carrier bearings are equally boned better to find it now
Edited by Rockatansky - 24-June-2025 at 10:36AM |
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-June-2025 at 12:37AM |
|
I went ahead and switched in my old 3.00:1 rear end until I can fully disassemble the limited slip one to see where the metal came from. I set the preload on the pinion with it removed from the pumpkin. I got it to 5 in-lb for just the pinion, and that's on the low end of the range for reused bearings. Got the housing cleaned up (there were a few more chunks of metal) and the new (old) one installed.
Test drive shows a tiny hint of gear whine, barely audible, certainly much quieter than with the other third member. I still get the deceleration rumble at the same RPM as before, but because it's a taller gear, it happens at road speeds faster than I usually drive it. It used to be slowing down from 70, and now it's slowing down from 77 or so. I usually drive at around 70 on the highway, so it's less of a problem. But the last thing to check to eliminate it completely is the driveshaft balance, unless it could be something in the transmission...? It wouldn't seem to be a wheel bearing since it's related to top gear engine RPM and thus how fast the driveshaft is turning, and not road speed. I don’t know if I can find a place locally that can balance driveshafts, especially one that can spin them to 3,000 RPM. If not, I guess I can watch the YouTube videos on how to balance it myself using a big hose clamp with the worm drive screw/housing as the weight. Note to self: remember to swap out the speedometer drive gear. I remembered a couple blocks into the test drive that I'd forgotten, so I used my phone's GPS speedometer app
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-June-2025 at 4:10AM |
|
has the tail housing bushing ever been changed out?
|
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Offline Points: 3445 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-June-2025 at 4:26AM |
|
That's where I was about to point to, be sure the driveshaft fits into the transmission very well. Check that it isn't loose sideways at all, and it goes in far enough to engage plenty of splines. That has caused issues for people who swapped shafts and didn't catch that the length was wrong or the bearing was worn badly etc. Get under it and give it a good yank to check for looseness.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
Inkara1
Senior Member
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 515 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-June-2025 at 4:53AM |
|
I don't know if anything has been done with that bushing. I do know the transmission was changed at some point because it's a C6 and the Marti report said the car came with C4. The yoke does fit well, though, and it has plenty of engagement on the shaft. I'll try to jiggle it around when I change the speedometer gear tonight.
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page <123> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |