![]() |
1972 351C starter? |
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Author | |
russosborne
Senior Member
Joined: 01-January-2015 Location: Glendale AZ Status: Offline Points: 664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: 1972 351C starter?Posted: 20-May-2015 at 9:49PM |
|
It's been a long time (30 + years) since I had to change a starter on a Cleveland.
I don't have to do so now, but I was just looking online for Cleveland stuff at Summit Racing and they list the same starter for a 302/351W/351C. Although I have seen other stuff they list for a Cleveland that no way will fit one. As do several other places. I really seem to remember that the Cleveland took an entirely different starter than the Windsor. Like 3 mounting bolts vs 2. Am I screwed up here or is Summit? It would really open up choices if I am wrong. Thanks, Russ |
|
![]() |
|
IndyLTD I I
Member
Joined: 01-March-2015 Location: Shelbyville, IN Status: Offline Points: 51 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-May-2015 at 11:52PM |
|
Yes the 351 C uses same starter only difference is manual or automatic transmission. The 351m/400/429/460 starters are different, they have 1 threaded mounting ear. The FE (390,427,428) engines use a 3 bolt mount if my memory serves me correctly.
|
|
|
Lee Virden
1978 LTD II S |
|
![]() |
|
russosborne
Senior Member
Joined: 01-January-2015 Location: Glendale AZ Status: Offline Points: 664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-May-2015 at 12:11AM |
|
Getting old bites.
I really thought the C had a different one. guess that means I can get one of the high torque starters at some point for it. Which is a good thing, if my mind lasts that long. Thanks, Russ |
|
![]() |
|
BadHabit351
Senior Member
Joined: 21-June-2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-October-2015 at 8:12AM |
I have a starter from a 1995 Mustang on my 393C. Higher torque and more header clearance. All it takes is a simple wiring change (no modifications).
|
|
|
1973/72 Gran Torino Sport
1971 Torino GT convertilble 2013 Ford Fusion 2004 Ford SuperDuty 2013 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
|
russosborne
Senior Member
Joined: 01-January-2015 Location: Glendale AZ Status: Offline Points: 664 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-November-2015 at 11:16PM |
|
Thanks.
Wiring isn't a problem for me. It's one of the few things I still enjoy in life.Another thing to add to the "someday" list. Are you using a stock starter? Saving money is always a good thing, if I don't have to buy an aftermarket one it would be nice. Just don't know how the stock ones compare torque wise. Russ |
|
![]() |
|
BadHabit351
Senior Member
Joined: 21-June-2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 12:49AM |
|
I bought a high dollar aftermarket starter. I had my motor "kick-back" and it stripped out the plastic (!!!) sun gear. I went to O'Reilly's and bought a stock starter for the 1995 Mustang 5.0L (about $75) and it's done a great job. My 393 is 10:1 compression and I run 12 degrees initial timing. The starter turns it over effortlessly. It's a poor mans high torque mini starter. Prior to this swap, I had to remove the passenger header to service the starter (which got burned up because of header heat). Now I can swap with no issue...and dropped 8-10 lbs in the process.
Wiring change: Swap the battery cable to the starter to the battery side of the inner fender solenoid (so it's a constant hot). The make up a 12-14 gauge wire from the "switched side" of the solenoid to the solenoid on the starter. That's it. |
|
|
1973/72 Gran Torino Sport
1971 Torino GT convertilble 2013 Ford Fusion 2004 Ford SuperDuty 2013 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Offline Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 3:06AM |
|
Yep, those PMGR starters are a great upgrade, especially when CR's go over 9.5 to 1. Even the factory Motorcraft/Ford PGMR's have some plastic internal parts
|
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
BadHabit351
Senior Member
Joined: 21-June-2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 4:35AM |
I figured if the $300 starter had plastic, then why not just buy the parts store starter for 1/4 the price. At least it isn't all that expensive when they "pop".
|
|
|
1973/72 Gran Torino Sport
1971 Torino GT convertilble 2013 Ford Fusion 2004 Ford SuperDuty 2013 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
|
BadHabit351
Senior Member
Joined: 21-June-2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 4:59AM |
|
Dang...they've gone up to $125. Still cheaper than the performance ones.
|
|
|
1973/72 Gran Torino Sport
1971 Torino GT convertilble 2013 Ford Fusion 2004 Ford SuperDuty 2013 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 5:54AM |
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Offline Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 6:05AM |
|
[QUOTE=Rockatansky]
http://www.dbelectrical.com/c-1126-50-liter.aspx[/QUOTE]
I had issues with the Db starter I purchased(wouldn't fully engage after a couple of weeks of use, grinding the flex-plate teeth got old QUICK). Hopefully for others, the Db starter issues were a fluke, or maybe just my luck
|
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
BadHabit351
Senior Member
Joined: 21-June-2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 6:22AM |
|
My brother in-law had issues with a starter purchased from them as well. That's why I went to the parts store to get one when my CVR starter took a dump.
|
|
|
1973/72 Gran Torino Sport
1971 Torino GT convertilble 2013 Ford Fusion 2004 Ford SuperDuty 2013 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
|
lynchster
Senior Member
Joined: 07-January-2006 Location: Pennsylvania Status: Offline Points: 2150 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 11:14AM |
That's useful information.
|
|
|
Chuck
72 Gran Torino Sport 13 Taurus SHO "Mr Pig" |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 12:21PM |
yup I'd rather have a used OEM part than new aftermarket most of the time I hope that beauty I'm not sure where it is works at least as long as it's been sitting now
|
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Offline Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 12:47PM |
I really hope I never have to find out
|
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
ilyes
Senior Member
Joined: 09-January-2010 Location: Philadelphia PA Status: Offline Points: 3782 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 2:16PM |
|
Sounds great, the stock starter is about 1/8" away from the headers on mine, gonna swap that out quick.
|
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Offline Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-November-2015 at 2:50PM |
|
Sorry I went off-topic with my last post. Here is a pic of the size differences between two Ford 460/auto starters, easy to tell which one will yield more header clearance. The PMGR starter on the right for the win.
![]() |
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
SocalTorino
Senior Member
Joined: 09-September-2011 Location: SOCAL Status: Offline Points: 344 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-April-2018 at 6:40AM |
|
Hi, doing some cpr on this topic,
My starter is starting to fail and is over heating with the long tubes. I want to switch to the smaller 95 5.0 starter to free up some space to help with the heat. But I’m having trouble understanding the wire route change Want to understand it’s before buying the starter My car is a stock 1972 351 Cj 4 speed Also Do I buy the automatic or 5 speed starter for the 95 Mustang 5.0 Edited by SocalTorino - 18-April-2018 at 6:41AM |
|
![]() |
|
aquartlow
Senior Member
Joined: 19-December-2011 Location: Summerfield, Fl Status: Offline Points: 2341 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-April-2018 at 7:21AM |
|
Dang, that must be some CPR, resuscitation at the 2.5 year mark
Edited by aquartlow - 18-April-2018 at 7:22AM |
|
|
www.supermotors.net/22468
Yeah, It's a Hybrid...It burns gas and tires. No matter how good she looks, somebody, somewhere, is tired of her sh*t. Beauty is skin deep, ugliness goes clear to the bone. |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-April-2018 at 7:34AM |
|
is this diagram also correct?
https://www.cjponyparts.com/tech-mini-starter/a/155/ i've heard of schematics out there that will run the starter all day after you let off the key ![]() |
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
SocalTorino
Senior Member
Joined: 09-September-2011 Location: SOCAL Status: Offline Points: 344 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-April-2018 at 7:55AM |
|
LoL old post need love too.
Cool thanks that really helped!! |
|
![]() |
|
BadHabit351
Senior Member
Joined: 21-June-2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-April-2018 at 9:05AM |
Both of those diagrams are the same and correct. More than likely what's happening with the "run the stater all day after you let off the key" is that starter solenoid is hanging up on the starter. There is no way that anyone with any mechanical ability can wire this wrong.
|
|
|
1973/72 Gran Torino Sport
1971 Torino GT convertilble 2013 Ford Fusion 2004 Ford SuperDuty 2013 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
|
BadHabit351
Senior Member
Joined: 21-June-2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-April-2018 at 9:08AM |
There is some modification to use this starter on your 4 speed. I'll check this out and get back to you shortly. The 5.0L starter is the same for auto & 5 speed...which fits auto in our cars, IIRC.
|
|
|
1973/72 Gran Torino Sport
1971 Torino GT convertilble 2013 Ford Fusion 2004 Ford SuperDuty 2013 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
|
BadHabit351
Senior Member
Joined: 21-June-2013 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 217 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-April-2018 at 9:31AM |
|
Found the info...if you have the 164 tooth flywheel; then you can't use the 5.0L PMGR starter from a parts store. The 164 tooth flywheel uses a different depth than the 157 tooth.
Pretty sure you have a 164 tooth flywheel which you would need this starter: https://www.summitracing.com/parts/fms-m11000mt164 or this one https://www.summitracing.com/parts/pwm-9604
|
|
|
1973/72 Gran Torino Sport
1971 Torino GT convertilble 2013 Ford Fusion 2004 Ford SuperDuty 2013 Mustang GT |
|
![]() |
|
RacerJames
Member
Joined: 25-April-2022 Location: 86401 Status: Offline Points: 128 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-March-2025 at 12:00PM |
|
Resurrecting this very old thread.
I have a 351C in the Torino race car with a3 speed toploader 157 tooth flywheel and an aftermarket scattershield with a custom made 3/16 thick engine plate which is the starter mount. The PO had installed a high torque starter and after I replaced the broken engine, I couldn't align the starter. after hours of pulling modifying and re installing the starter and mount plate without success, I chose to pull the trans and inspect the flywheel. I verified that it's 157 teeth, and it was holey, like someone balanced it with the other engine. I replaced it with a billet unit I got a smoking deal on. While it was out I laid an oem 157 tooth engine plate over the custom plate and scattershield in order to align the starter (modify the mounting) one final time. Put it all back together, and when I hit the start button it cranks, but grinds like the GM cars I remenber hearing in the 80s, when the shims weren't right. So I perused the interwebs and Google's AI says that an AT starter is 3/8 of an inch deeper into the bellhousing than an M/T one. So I must have an A/T starter? Anyone have measurements available?
|
|
|
'73 Torino Stock Car
'71 Mustang Stock Car 351C powered |
|
![]() |
|
72 RS 351
Senior Member
Joined: 04-September-2014 Location: Knoxville TN Status: Online Points: 3443 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-March-2025 at 12:08PM |
|
Is there any chance you can use a 164 tooth flywheel? I'm presuming that late model starters will be easier to get with many more choices. I'd try hard to make a common late starter fit, then you could great options to choose from. I had heard the manual starters were different, but it's been ages since those memories were lost.
|
|
|
Don
73 Ranchero "Sport 72 front end", floor shift/console, planning EFI 7000 rpm 351 stroker 73 Ranchero GT 351C-4V &4R70W for sale later. 92 Lincoln Mark VII SE GTC, OBDII 347/4R70W |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-March-2025 at 12:24PM |
|
A/T and M/T starters also have different register diameters, the circle that engages the block plate and positively locates the starter to align with the ring gear. this is where i feel your issue lies rather than the longer snout length. if it was the snout length you'd never attempt to bolt it up. and ergo the round cut out in the block plates are different diameters and match their respective starters based on transmission type. are you using an A/T block plate with an M/T starter? simplest way to ID that i know of is, M/T block plates don't have any inspection cover while A/T block plates do have the small removable section
|
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
RacerJames
Member
Joined: 25-April-2022 Location: 86401 Status: Offline Points: 128 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-March-2025 at 3:59PM |
|
Thanks for the quick reply.
Most of my stuff has historically been AT and the block plate I used for aligning the custom block plate on the car is for an AT. As you can see I've modified the custom plate quite a bit and the mounting circle probably isn't the problem. I do not want to put a 164 tooth fw on it because the clutch wouldn't fit and I'm too much into the conservation of personal finances to buy another new one. Not to mention how I'm also into the conservation of personal energy. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
'73 Torino Stock Car
'71 Mustang Stock Car 351C powered |
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-March-2025 at 6:05AM |
the AT plate and the MT plate share the same starter bolt hole locations, the issue comes with the register hole which yours can't possibly be accurate (if it's there at all)? the difference in the registers is only .050" but the slop in the bolt holes has to be much more. just the small register starter in the large register plate will cause issues as in a wiped out starter bendix and ring gear. FWIW have you measured the register on the mini starter? what's the bendix throw? all i can tell ya is it's the precise fit of the starter in the plate that locates the starter this was originally posted by RobbMc to the old 351C.net forum which no longer pulls up, all the links are fubar but i saved the text in my secret stash. here's the lowdown on Ford starters as RobbMc sees it "Ford starters are a little complicated. I started working for Tilton in
the 1980's and have been designing starters ever since and I still get a
little confused at times. Since the 1960's, most Ford V8 engines (except maybe the new modular motors) use one of three basic starter mounting designs . The all use the same 9 tooth, 1" diameter gear. Some use three mounting bolts (such as FE) and some use only two, but fortunately 2 of 3 mounting holes are in the same place so they can be interchanged. There are three different ring gear offsets (the distance the ring gear is from the starter mounting surface). SB's and Clevelands with automatics use an offset of 3/4". All FE engines (as well as 5.0L with T5 trans) also use a 3/4" offset. The starter register diameter (ie. the diameter of the hole in the starter mounting plate) is 4.09". SB's and Clevelands with a 3 or 4 speed manual trans use a 3/8" offset. The starter register diameter is 4.14". 351M/400/429/460 engines use a 5/8" offset. The register diameter is 4.09". The starters for this application are easy to spot as one mounting hole is tapped. Yes, there are several different ring gears with different tooth counts but this is taken care of by the starter mounting plates. The starter mounting plates for the larger ring gears have the register diameter further from the center of the engine. I am sure there are exceptions to all the above, but these are the general rules for Ford starters. If you measure the distance from the mounting surface to the ring gear and measure the starter hole in the mounting plate, you can usually determine which starter you need." ~ RobbMc Edited by Rockatansky - 10-March-2025 at 12:01PM |
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 6398 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-March-2025 at 6:07AM |
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
![]() |
|
Post Reply
|
Page 12> |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |