|
youtuber Pole Barn Gargage 73 Torino vid |
Post Reply 
|
| Author | |
Rockatansky 
Senior Member 
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 5940 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Topic: youtuber Pole Barn Gargage 73 Torino vidPosted: 24-April-2023 at 2:45PM |
|
just popped up on my feed, watching it now don't blame me! |
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
 |
|
|
handsofstone
Senior Member
Joined: 13-April-2018 Location: Northeast Status: Offline Points: 3917 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-April-2023 at 5:03AM |
|
I would never have a scoop on a 73. The front looks sweet without adding one of any type whether grafting a 72 or a Torino like he has. But to each their own
|
|
|
|
|
Rockatansky
Senior Member
Joined: 30-July-2010 Location: On The Road Status: Offline Points: 5940 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-June-2023 at 11:05AM |
|
follow up vid |
|
|
72 GT Ute
|
|
|
|
|
Eliteman76
Admin Group 
Joined: 20-March-2006 Location: Nebraska, USA Status: Offline Points: 4938 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-June-2023 at 10:58AM |
|
Guy is nice and down to earth...but a few things, like the air shocks...needs to learn not to tie the lines to a single tee fitting. Jim Williams wrecked his S&H car that way.
|
|
 Andrew:GTS.ORG admin, '72 Q code 5 speed RestomodPondering: #99Problems |
|
|
|
|
Inkara1
Member 
Joined: 17-November-2021 Location: Ridgecrest, CA Status: Offline Points: 193 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-June-2023 at 11:24AM |
|
I'm curious about his 450 CFM carb for his 400 V8. I have a 600 CFM on my 351C with 2V heads. I guess if you're not going past 4,000 RPM, it would flow enough.
|
|
|
1972 Gran Torino station wagon, light blue, 351C 2V, prior owner upgraded to 4V (2V heads), originally had a C4 but prior owner changed to C6 for some reason.
|
|
|
|
|
Eliteman76
Admin Group
Joined: 20-March-2006 Location: Nebraska, USA Status: Offline Points: 4938 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-June-2023 at 11:41AM |
|
Way undersized IMO. Factory 400 carbs were typically 500CFM?
I know there were factory carbs for 400 V8's that were actually a tick bigger. I ran an Edelbrock 1405 A 600CFM performer carb on my '79 F150 4x4 for years and I hated the start up over the factory carb, but driving, it was miles better with the 4 barrel carb. I also had swapped to a used Torker intake so on the stock 400, it was OK for how the truck was.
|
|
|
Andrew:GTS.ORG admin, '72 Q code 5 speed Restomod Pondering: #99Problems |
|
|
|
|
72FordGTS
Admin Group
GTS.org Admin Joined: 06-September-2005 Location: Ontario, Canada Status: Offline Points: 5656 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-June-2023 at 2:25PM |
|
I had some time to watch the videos, not too bad. It's nice to see an old Torino get some positive coverage. He clearly loves the car. I personally don't mind a scoop on a '73. I actually think the Boss 429 style scoop looks better on a '73 than a '72 style scoop. It seems to match the blunt front end better. I am curious on the 450 carb too? That would offer nothing over the stock 2100. That Holley 2-bbl that was on there was defintely smaller than the original 2100. When my '72 400 was stock I did a 4bbl swap like him, but used a Holley 670. It really woke up the engine on the high end, pulled very nicely for a stock low compression engine. I agree on the air shocks. He also needs to get some stiffer springs or sway bars on that beast.
|
|
|
Vince
1972 Ford GTS Sportsroof - Survivor, One Family car GTS.org Admin |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options